Started By
Message

re: Pels Game 52

Posted on 2/10/24 at 5:17 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111156 posts
Posted on 2/10/24 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Laker loss is not a big deal on the record
Definitely not

Before these 2 games, I'm sure no one would realistically predict we'd win both. A split was expected


Not too worried about the result but the 2 biggest process concerns for me were:

- Zion defense - Don't need to elaborate on that lol

- Willie rotation - Specific to no Hawkins. It was evident by the 2nd quarter that we were going to need to outscore them. Dyson loses a ton of value when the opponent sets their franchise record for points in a half. And thus, it was obvious imo that we were going to win by outscoring them, so Hawk shoulda got more run in place of Dyson.
Posted by Pistol44
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2019
1902 posts
Posted on 2/10/24 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Before these 2 games, I'm sure no one would realistically predict we'd win both. A split was expected


For sure, but everyone wanted to ….. lol. Perimeter defense was bad, Pels defense goes rancid when a lead guard breaks them down.

Arguably Pels two best subs have both been in and out of the rotation (Jose and Hawk) and compete for minutes, maybe Dyson more in the front court since Griff and Trajen didn’t move at the deadline.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram