- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LIVE (*now adjourned*): Supreme Court hearing case on Trump's Colorado ballot eligibility
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:14 am
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:14 am
C-SPAN
The Supreme Court hears oral arguments in former President Trump’s appeal of a Colorado Supreme Court’s decision ruling him ineligible to be on the state’s presidential election ballot.
The Supreme Court hears oral arguments in former President Trump’s appeal of a Colorado Supreme Court’s decision ruling him ineligible to be on the state’s presidential election ballot.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 11:24 am
10
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:15 am to EKG
Is this the case where Colorado has 10 minutes to explain why their move was constitutional?
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:16 am to EKG
Isn’t it refreshing to know that three votes are already decided
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:19 am to EKG
Roberts “ Insurrection “. frick this clown world. Constructed by Democrats for Democrats. All who disagree can kick rocks. No longer citizens, but subjects. No longer a Constitutional Republic but a bureaucratic behemoth.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:21 am to EKG
6-3 in favor of Trump.
/Thread
/Thread
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:29 am to EKG
This is a watershed moment.
If states can choose who they allow to run for federal office, this could get wildly out of hand.
If it is upheld, Texas should prevent Biden from running for president within the state.
If states want the ability to determine who can run for state office, so be it.
They can choose “how” elections should be run within their states, but the concept of them choosing “who” can run for federal office is out of the question.
If states can choose who they allow to run for federal office, this could get wildly out of hand.
If it is upheld, Texas should prevent Biden from running for president within the state.
If states want the ability to determine who can run for state office, so be it.
They can choose “how” elections should be run within their states, but the concept of them choosing “who” can run for federal office is out of the question.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 9:31 am
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:35 am to EKG
4 ladies on the court and 2 lady men. Ominous. No way something as insignificant as the US Constitution can compete with all those feelings.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:10 am to EKG
I'm baffled that the outcome of an entire Presidential election hinges on a fricking lawsuit by a single woman in Colorado with TDS and is based on a criminal charge that never took place.
Is this the threat to democracy we've been hearing about?
Is this the threat to democracy we've been hearing about?
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:11 am to EKG
Thomas in boss mode
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:32 am to EKG
gorsuch bitch slapping this punk bitch
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:16 am to EKG
I'm not a lawyer and I'm sure this has been said, but isn't this as simple as how can you penalize somebody who hasn't been found guilty? Wouldn't this clearly violate innocent until proven guilty? This seems like a judge giving a defendant 20 years at the arraignment
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News