- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Help me understand why NIL recruitment inducements aren’t bribery
Posted on 2/7/24 at 5:21 pm to bayou85
Posted on 2/7/24 at 5:21 pm to bayou85
quote:
Do you think when a FA picks one team over another based on money that he has been bribed
He is an employee there and being paid as such. With Collectives they are not employees of them.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 6:29 pm to fastlane
Employment doesn’t matter. It’s not bribery to be paid for a service.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 7:44 pm to fastlane
quote:
He is an employee there and being paid as such. With Collectives they are not employees of them.
Why are you hung up on the “employee” thing.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
A paid spokesman is not a “employee”. If you listen to a sports talk show or a podcast and they read an add they are not “employees” of that company.
NIL stands for name image and likeness. The collectives pool money from some boosters to ultimately pay the players for their NIL, in effect it may be a “pay for play” but there is something else involved. The player is a spokesman for a certain company or they appear at a business location promote a product on social media etc.
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 7:58 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)