Started By
Message

re: New Category 6 Hurricane Classification Proposed Due to Climate Change

Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:37 am to
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
6963 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:37 am to
quote:

And in fact, as they add more coal powered plants to power more and more electric cars, they’re actually doing the opposite of what you, in your feeble mind, think they’re doing.

There is no overnight fix. They still need power. Sorry that you can't understand that transporting gas all over China creates more emissions than creating electricity at a power plant and then charging the car through the grid. Based on China's power grid, it is 45% less emissions.


The goal isn't "100% clean" , it's "less dirty"
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 9:40 am
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64963 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:49 am to
quote:

There is no overnight fix. They still need power. Sorry that you can't understand that transporting gas all over China creates more emissions than creating electricity at a power plant and then charging the car through the grid. Based on China's power grid, it is 45% less emissions.


quote:

The goal isn't "100% clean" , it's "less dirty"


The numbers don’t lie. Their CO2 emissions are still exploding, skyrocketing over 200% in the past 30 years.



And the vast majority of their CO2 emissions come from coal, not burning fossil fuels.


Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69095 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:10 am to
quote:

The goal isn't "100% clean" , it's "less dirty"



Well, that would be impossible and has not been the stated goal.

What they are pushing is zero emissions. Which is also impossible.

This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 10:12 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram