re: Shapiro Is a Little Snake in the Grass

quote:

---

So wanting there to be peace in Ukraine with both sides being granted concessions is considered "neocon" in 2024?

From your link:

quote:
But we are now stuck in this weird binary strawman situation in which we are told that either we must fund Ukraine "until they win, as long as it takes," without defining winning or "as long as it takes"; or "we must stop the war in Ukraine" without defining what "stopping" looks like (does it mean withdrawing all aid, thus leading Russia to take Kyiv?).

What about the position that we have interests in Ukraine, that they do not match the Ukrainian interests entirely, and that we should fund Ukraine so as to prevent their takeover while pushing for a peace agreement that cedes certain territory to the Russians while granting security guarantees to the Ukrainians?

---

It' not from "My link". It's from Shapiro's Twitter.

Highlighted an obvious neocon part for you. FUND UKRAINE. Such fiscal conservativism.

Go the frick back to OT thread where you blow the other Ukrosimps. I can already tell you chirp in there.