Started By
Message

re: Democrats Propose Bill to Neuter Militias

Posted on 1/13/24 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

I feel differently.

Let's see...
quote:

I think the existence of non-violent fringe groups is proof that our Constitutional rights are at least partially intact.

I agree.
quote:

I want an America full of Patriots and flat earth moon bats and everything in between, all living beyond the coercive appetites of hangry unelected bureaucrats.

I do as well.
quote:

Organize, exercise your rights and head to the woods

He's where we diverge. Head to the fricking woods? Head to the fricking POLLS! That's how we do it in this country. If you don't want to do it that way, move to a different country.
quote:

If not, every Muslim mosque should be "moved against" tomorrow by Federal agents.

So we diverge here as well. frick ALL religions. But, because I am a patriot, I will abide by the law of the land and support the free exercise of religion. All or none.
quote:

Because my list of those who might overthrow the government is entirely superior to your list.

Now you're just being weird. If there are armed groups of muzzies training in the woods to overthrow the government, I will not accept that as a tenet of their religion, and would accept the government rounding them up. Under your rules, they would be well within their rights to train in our country to overthrow it. I disagree with you there.

All in all, though, we agree on much if not all.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262219 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

If there are armed groups of muzzies training in the woods to overthrow the government, I will not accept that as a tenet of their religion,


You are such a world class pussy.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34719 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

If there are armed groups of muzzies training in the woods to overthrow the government,


This is an assumption. Unless it is documented (and overt).

Otherwise, it seems rather bigoted.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
79137 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 1:55 pm to
Sure we agree on stuff. But you seem to be missing the essence of my post. You believe that YOU get to decide the definition of these things. That's my point. For instance, you've decided that they want to "overthrow the government". You've also assigned violent intentions to them. And of course you've also designed a false choice (go the polls vs right to assemble, right to free speech, right to bear arms, etc). They probably prefer to do BOTH. These Americans have decided that they don't need your approval to exercise their rights.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34719 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 1:56 pm to
Sooooooo…to piggyback off of the thread on Trump not being subject to legal ramifications, perhaps you will answer this question:

quote:

If Biden says that militias (aka US citizens that won’t support his stupidity) are terrorists, can he have the military (arbitrarily and without penalty) kill them?
Posted by TigerBalsagna
tRedStick
Member since Jan 2015
733 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 3:48 pm to
quote:


He's where we diverge. Head to the fricking woods? Head to the fricking POLLS! That's how we do it in this country. If you don't want to do it that way, move to a different country.


The founders literally went to the woods, and you claim that's not how we do it. You are sick. Seek help.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram