- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump’s Boldest Argument Yet: Immunity From Prosecution for Assassinations
Posted on 1/11/24 at 1:28 pm to the808bass
Posted on 1/11/24 at 1:28 pm to the808bass
quote:
Hamilton laid out the process in steps. Impeachment and removal came first.
If that’s what they wanted to require, they should have worded the clause better.
Posted on 1/11/24 at 1:33 pm to Indefatigable
Great. You should take that up with the founding fathers. Maybe include your CV.
You should also keep in mind that the founding fathers weren’t sophists.
You should also keep in mind that the founding fathers weren’t sophists.
Posted on 1/11/24 at 1:35 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
If that’s what they wanted to require, they should have worded the clause better.
The Constitution as originally written, is barely over 4000 words long. There are innumerable items they could have explained better, expanded on, or reworded, but they could not know every question and issue that would pop up 200 years later.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)