Started By
Message

re: Trump’s Boldest Argument Yet: Immunity From Prosecution for Assassinations

Posted on 1/11/24 at 9:55 am to
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
227 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 9:55 am to
The Founding Fathers were brilliant.
They understood the dangers of politics and impeachment and conviction of a President as a first step for criminal prosecution lessened the chances the country would devolve into backwoods Banana Republic like we see today where unelected partisan Secretaries of State push former Presidents off the ballot for any made up reason they can think.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425616 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 10:08 am to
quote:

They understood the dangers of politics and impeachment and conviction of a President as a first step for criminal prosecution lessened the chances the country would devolve into backwoods Banana Republic like we see today where unelected partisan Secretaries of State push former Presidents off the ballot for any made up reason they can think.


This is an ENTIRELY different argument, legally.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
27304 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 10:27 am to
quote:

The Founding Fathers were brilliant.

Agreed.

Which is why impeachment and criminal conviction have absolutely no bearing on each other. It’s in the plain text.

Arguing that legislative impeachment and removal is a prerequisite to criminal prosecution is almost as bad as the related double jeopardy argument.

No chance the federal courts buy either one.
This post was edited on 1/11/24 at 10:30 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram