Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

re: NASA pushes back dates for Artemis II and Artemis III missions.

Posted on 1/10/24 at 9:12 pm to
Posted by LSU Jonno
Huntsville, AL
Member since Feb 2008
581 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 9:12 pm to
The per launch cost numbers for Starship assume something like 140 launches per year which amortizes their manpower cost across those launches. That's a cost of about 2B per year which is more than what we spend on SLS. I'm not saying SLS is cheap but you are comparing apples to televisions.

Plus you are using predicted numbers on extrapolated launch rates, none of which is proven. It's really easy to make up numbers and feed them to the public.

A more accurate cost comparison would be cost per mission. There are plans to bring SLS's costs down. Will it touch what SpaceX can do? Well, probably not, but per-mission costs will be closer than you think when you take into account 20 launches per mission for Starship for Artemis.

Simply launching SLS twice a year would make up that difference.
This post was edited on 1/10/24 at 9:15 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram