re: Raffensperger refusing to testify about Georgia's voting machines

quote:

---

There’s no tracking of changes made by user.

---

Cardinal rule type of flaw

quote:

---

When ballots are not automatically adjudicated, a user can go in and determine the voters intent, print out the new ballot with the “voters intent” and replace the original ballot with the new adjudicated ballot.

---

Even an attorney should be able to see the problem with that

quote:

---

There is some indication that ballots which did not adjudicate can be adjudicated by batch processes. Try to let that sink in. Thus the clamor for the original ballot images.

---

This brings in mass manipulation possibilities. It would be instant disqualification of a security audit for approval to be used.

quote:

---

This would not be unacceptable security for a voting system for a high school election. Let alone a state-wide federal election.

---

It violates almost every state law regarding the voting equipment.

quote:

---

That’s to say nothing of software updates and timing, fractional voting possibilities, lack of ongoing certification of machines and internet connectivity.

---

You also didn't mention that the physical audit of ballots doesn't match the soft ballot count...and that some ballot images are missing...and some ballots are missing...and that of the few ballot image they've seen they found duplicate ballots.

SFP knows these things. He tries to focus on the "pillow man" because he thinks it allows him to ignore it.