- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mickey Mouse copyright expires after 95 years.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 9:40 am to TrueTiger
Posted on 12/25/23 at 9:40 am to TrueTiger
I think Disney sucks in a lot of ways but “dominance over copyright law”? Mickey is Disney. How does anyone deserve to have the rights to him other than the company that created him?
Posted on 12/25/23 at 9:41 am to Schmelly
Now do all the public domain titles that Disney has made billions off of over the years
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:15 am to Schmelly
quote:
I think Disney sucks in a lot of ways but “dominance over copyright law”? Mickey is Disney. How does anyone deserve to have the rights to him other than the company that created him?
Allowing the ownership of acts of creative expression in perpetuity would create a hellscape of creative stagnation that I’m not sure some of you are really wrapping your heads around. As has been mentioned already on this thread, most of Disney’s early animation catalogue wouldn’t exist if not for creative works becoming public domain. Or should Disney have been required to pay von Goethe’s family several hundred years later for the rights to depict the story of The Sorcerer’s Apprentice?
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:02 am to Schmelly
quote:
I think Disney sucks in a lot of ways but “dominance over copyright law”? Mickey is Disney. How does anyone deserve to have the rights to him other than the company that created him?
The people who created the Steamboat Willy cartoon are dead. Nobody at the company named "Disney" had any involvement in the creation of Steamboat Willy.
Why should Americans have to pay anyone for the use of this historical cartoon? Who alive actually deserves payment for the creation of Steamboat Willy?
If we should have to pay descendants of cartoon creators to watch or adapt cartoons from a century ago, you probably think reparations for slavery is a good idea too.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:18 am to Schmelly
quote:
I think Disney sucks in a lot of ways but “dominance over copyright law”? Mickey is Disney. How does anyone deserve to have the rights to him other than the company that created him?
I was thinking Trademark here... Copywrite is something written, filmed or idea.. or sumsuch
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)