- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 12/22/23 at 7:25 am to bamarep
quote:
So basically, everywhere that doesn't know shite about wolves or risk having to live along side them voted to reintroduce them.
Makes sense.
Unfortunately that is the way it tends to go... Populated areas make decisions and rural areas get screwed. The majority of California if you look at area wise is conservative. Modoc, Lassen, Shasta, and other counties are every bit as conservative as South Louisiana. But not a lot of people so they get Fricked.
Posted on 12/22/23 at 9:45 am to bamarep
quote:
that doesn't know shite about wolves or risk having to live along side them
Would you really be scared to live in an area where some wolves were released? The last time someone was reportedly killed by a wolf in the US was 13 years ago and it was in Alaska. Like 4 deaths in the past 80 years. This isn't going to be a danger for humans.
Edit: I'm not saying re-introducing them was a good idea, just simply that it would be pretty dumb to be afraid to live or go in an area where the handful of wolves that were introduced live, you're not going to get attacked. If you're a farmer and worried about your livestock, that's a different issue.
This post was edited on 12/22/23 at 9:54 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News