Started By
Message

re: The math for buying a home no longer works, per WSJ

Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:44 am to
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30651 posts
Posted on 12/20/23 at 9:44 am to
quote:

The biggest problem is most banks won't give you a mortgage that small. It's easier to get approved for a $200k loan vs a 100k loan.

$200k loan is fine. We’re talking about an average monthly income of $78k. They shouldn’t buy a $400k house like the article is suggesting, but a $200-250k is perfect as a starter home
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13873 posts
Posted on 12/20/23 at 10:11 am to
quote:

but a $200-250k is perfect as a starter home


Houses at this price that aren't in horrible areas of town or complete shitholes aren't really available in most places.

We bought a small spot in a "gentrifying" area and flipped it and then flipped another until landing in current spot. But if we were in our 20s again, we couldn't afford to do this. shite is so damn expensive now.
Posted by Monahans
Member since Sep 2019
1252 posts
Posted on 12/20/23 at 10:37 am to
I hope people are starting to understand that for this regime this is a feature, not a bug. Private ownership of property is not something they’re looking to promote.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram