- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Special counsel asks Supreme Court to rule quickly whether Trump can be prosecuted
Posted on 12/11/23 at 1:44 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 12/11/23 at 1:44 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
SCOTUS should slow walk this. Let it run its course in the Federal appeals system. SCOTUS should hear it in the Fall, then let the electorate weigh in before issuing any ruling.
Why?
I fail to see the reasoning other than wanting that solely because it’s potentially advantageous to Trump individually.
There’s no reason that the electorate needs to go into the election speculating as to whether Trump can even be indicted. Just resolve it now.
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 1:46 pm
1
Posted on 12/11/23 at 1:53 pm to Indefatigable
quote:My opinion has nothing whatsoever to do with advantageousness to Trump. SCOTUS needs to do what it can to avoid politicizing itself in an election year. If it finds against Smith in an expedited hearing, and thereby scuttles Smith's DC case, its action would appear political. If it finds (incorrectly IMO) that Smith and the Obama judge are correct, the finding would appear political. It sounds as if you are assuming Trump wins in the Fall.
I fail to see the reasoning other than wanting that solely because it’s potentially advantageous to Trump individually.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News