- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:23 pm to 225Tyga
That’s some horseshite right there
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:24 pm to 225Tyga
If Army had gotten that call it would have been ballgame.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:24 pm to 225Tyga
quote:
Ball hit his foot. Clearly Bad call
Conspiracy Time: CBS prefers to keep this a one/two score game as long as possible.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:24 pm to 225Tyga
How did they frick that call up? It clearly hit the top of his foot
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:24 pm to Wolfhound45
“Hey it hit his foot but we need this game to be closer so just say the call stands”
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:25 pm to plazadweller
I mean it doesn’t get much more conclusive than that. What in the frick
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:25 pm to cpp2208
quote:
Lol unbelievable. CLEARLY hit his foot
honestly, I was 98% convinced it DID hit his foot, but the camera quality wasn't GREAT
it's one of those calls where you let stand either way. since they said didn't touch originally, I think that's a good call
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:25 pm to auzach91
Refs wants to keep the game close. Just because it’s army/navy doesn’t mean the officiating is clean.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:25 pm to cpp2208
It doesn’t get any clearer than that. If that play was in a game that mattered to me tv gets destroyed
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:26 pm to MJackson
Idk there were multiple angles where it clearly hit his foot
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:26 pm to 9Fiddy
I wasn’t 100% convinced. I’m fine with the inconclusive evidence call. Other angle looked like space between foot and ball. The back angle made it look like the ball was on his foot because the ball was further from the camera than his foot
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:26 pm to 9Fiddy
It just makes me question everything when they frick that up
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:27 pm to MJackson
I don't know what y'all are watching because there wasn't any clear proof that hit him.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:27 pm to UncleLester
quote:REC.
Conspiracy Time: CBS prefers to keep this a one/two score game as long as possible.
Somehow this was the REC.
No doubt.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:27 pm to StrongOffer
It rolled off his foot. You can see it in 2 angles
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:28 pm to plazadweller
Why did we go to commercial just now? End of Quarter?
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:30 pm to UncleLester
The old Monken special. He could have put this away. But that would mean the credit goes to the players being Superior.
He wants to win close.
He wants to win close.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:31 pm to plazadweller
quote:
It rolled off his foot. You can see it in 2 angles
i only saw the one angle where they had to zoom in, and it was pixelated. it seems like it touched his foot, but again, the picture quality wasn't great IMO
like i said, I'm of the belief to "let things stand, unless there's CLEAR and INDISPUTABLE evidence" the other way. If we had better camera quality, and we had multiple angles, I'd be in favor of changing
JMO
Posted on 12/9/23 at 4:31 pm to UncleLester
We go to a commercial break with 7 seconds left in the quarter?
Now, that is scripted to make up for the lack of commercials during the long Army drive that resulted in a punt.
Now, that is scripted to make up for the lack of commercials during the long Army drive that resulted in a punt.
This post was edited on 12/9/23 at 4:32 pm
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News