Started By
Message

re: Kelly supports the Bama over FSU decision

Posted on 12/7/23 at 12:40 pm to
Posted by DakIsNoLB
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
610 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

The only control a team has is winning their games. FSU did that with and without their QB. They won a championship 10 years ago, they have made the playoff in the past, their conference has won since then, and even Notre Dame (a quasi member) has made it several times.

This is bad for college football and if you can see it you are very short sighted.


And they did it with a weaker schedule. If SoS doesn't matter, then put Liberty in.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16593 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

And they did it with a weaker schedule. If SoS doesn't matter, then put Liberty in.


Just forget what happens on the field. Look at pre-season roster strength and scrimmages and base their decisions on that. If we're gonna do this then let's do it.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20050 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

And they did it with a weaker schedule. If SoS doesn't matter, then put Liberty in.


The committee said FSU didn’t get in because their QB got hurt. Not because of any other reason. Anything else is just an effort to justify a decision that has already been made with admittedly different criteria used.

FSU played 2 SEC teams away from home in a conference that has produced a NC winner in the playoff era. The ACC had a winning record vs the SEC. If their schedule is weak, it’s completely circumstantial.

Liberty isn’t even in the discussion because FSU didn’t get in. That’s a straw man argument, and it’s not even in conflict with any advocating for FSU.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram