re: The more you watch the reactions to the FSU snub….

quote:

---

12-1 in the SEC with #5 SOS > 13-0 in the ACC with #55 SOS and a backup QB. I

---

But here is the problem, you have to look at all 4 teams that got in ahead of FSU, not just bama. What makes FSU so different from Washington or Michigan? From Texas?

People are focusing on bama vs FSU as if that was the only decision that had to be made. Then you mentally match them up, and give bama the benefit of the doubt because they are historically a team that’s very hard to beat.

That is a stupid way to look at things and ultimately gives bama more opportunities to win and perpetuate that same bias.

quote:

---

12-1 in the SEC with #5 SOS > 13-0 in the ACC with #55 SOS and a backup QB. If Travis was healthy, you go with FSU.

---

NEXT MAN UP!!

quote:

---

Travis was healthy, you go with FSU

---

Why? It doesn't change the strength of schedule argument you've made.

So why doesn't strength of schedule matter if Teavis is healthy but it does if he isnt???

quote:

---

and a backup QB. If Travis was healthy, you go with FSU.

---

How’d the bengals win against the jags the other night then? According to this logic they should have been beat pretty good.

FSU has talent all over the field too.

Also, if we’re talking about putting in the 4 best teams, then why is Wash in there? I don’t think there is a single person in this country that thinks wash is better than uga.

This sport is now dictated by the greed of network executives and CFB is dying bc of it.