quote:
Which people? Maybe you dumb fricks should worry about what people actually say. Nah who am I kidding this place is full of idiots.

It's not a "rigged competition". What I said was if the guy thinks Nuss sucks then how was Nuss vs JD a "competition". How hard is that to comprehend for some of you dumb fricks?

Nice crawfish.

Your exact words:

quote:
Jayden didn't win shite. You can't claim Nuss sucks while also claiming he was sufficient competition kid. He was handed the job and you had no issue with it.

It seems to me that you’re one of those people who think transfer quarterbacks with experience never have to compete for the job in camp. Personally, I think that’s an ignorant assumption by many folks (one that is often reinforced based by the individual’s opinion that the guy on the bench is better). There are certainly a lot of cases where a transfer is the obvious starter, but that doesn’t mean the coaches are giving them guarantees before even seeing them in camp.

quote:
Where was the calls for a transfer year 2 with JD? For "depth" or "competition"?

In year 2 of JD we had 1) a returning starter and 2) an experienced backup (while Nuss hadn’t been a starter, he was absolutely experienced compared to most backup QBs). We have neither of those things going into 2024. I don’t think it’s that complicated.

quote:
There's no way to know who is "better" which is the point.

There’s no way to know? Really?

You don’t think the coaches are capable of evaluating the QBs in spring camp?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TigerKnights

Member since Jun 2011

3277 posts

Posted on 12/1/23 at 11:05 am to lostinbr

quote:
Nice crawfish.

Your exact words:

Yes, my exact words. You read the part in between what you highlighted right? Did you want me to spell out "by your logic" when it's implied?

quote:
It seems to me that you’re one of those people who think transfer quarterbacks with experience never have to compete for the job in camp

No, I'm saying that's the logic people are using to claim any transfer is superior. It's not logic at all. Every player is a risk even a "proven" transfer. Notwithstanding the impact on recruiting and maintaining younger players if you keep going the transfer route. I do believe if they brought in someone who is limited in eligibility they aren't coming here without guarantees. That applies more to other guys who were discussed not Moore.

quote:
In year 2 of JD we had 1) a returning starter and 2) an experienced backup (while Nuss hadn’t been a starter, he was absolutely experienced compared to most backup QBs). We have neither of those things going into 2024. I don’t think it’s that complicated.

We have a presumptive starter and a backup at the same level Nuss was year 1 of JD. My point was if Nuss sucks so bad how was anyone comfortable going into year 2 with him as the backup and "competition" to push JD.

quote:
There’s no way to know? Really?

You don’t think the coaches are capable of evaluating the QBs in spring camp?

Coaches can though they can also be wrong. I'm referring to people on this board. Honestly I think BK likes Nuss and has openly done multiple things to retain him. Splitting drives in last year's bowl, praising him before the Florida game, and putting him in a leadership role. I've said repeatedly Nuss will be the starter and some here will be upset by it which is sad.

A bigger concern which is probably what Shea was discussing would be pushing out Underwood if you bring in a guy who is the presumptive starter after Nuss. If you're going by recruiting rankings or supposed potential Howard was higher than Nuss right? Yet Nuss being here with JD returning pushed him out. Not because of competition just because it's too long of a wait.

1 ...

Report Post

LSU Recruiting - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board