Started By
Message

re: Trump says he is going to get Bagram Air Base back in a "Trade Deal"

Posted on 11/20/23 at 12:55 pm to
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74480 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

You’re a nasty person


so I hurt your feelings
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34603 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

I mean, gee wiz, how many more bases do we need overseas?


If you want to be the lone superpower, then you go with a physical presence.

It is what it is.

I view it as the sword of Damocles.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34603 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

The only reason we would use the base is to start new military operations


Or…as a threat to do so.
Posted by Jspaspa3303
Member since Jun 2020
2414 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:03 pm to
Better in our hands than the Chinese hands . Should still be in our hands if your current government knew how to govern .
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
72074 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

You gonna cry? Did I hurt your little gay feelers?
by rmnldr

quote:

You’re a nasty person
by rmnldr



Muh mean tweets!!
Posted by Ribbed
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2023
2745 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

You gonna cry? Did I hurt your little gay feelers?
quote:

You’re a nasty person

I detect zero lies.
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
9389 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:34 pm to
The ronfags have become nasty little bitches since their political savior is turning out to be less than Krispy Kreme.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26772 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Trump says he is going to get Bagram Air Base back in a "Trade Deal"


Seems pretty stupid on its face, regardless of who proposed it.

We should have never given up Bagram. But now that we did, trying to reacquire it by having to subject ourselves to the whims of the Pakistanis and the Taliban seems incredibly stupid.

What purpose would reacquiring Bagram even have?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74480 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:42 pm to
Thin skinned babies. Always crying about everything and then when calles out they implode
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8714 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Better in our hands than the Chinese hands . Should still be in our hands if your current government knew how to govern .


Look at a map.

We have no assets anywhere close to Bagram now. There is no way to access it without going through Russia and then one of the Stans, China, Iran, or Pakistan. So that means going through Pakistan for hundreds of miles and then hundreds more in Afghanistan. All by plane and all requiring the permission of the Taliban and Pakistan.

Let's assume you get the base. What are you going to do with it? Even getting fuel there is going to be a freaking nightmare and you will need a massive amount of troops to keep it secure. Then anything you do from it will have to be approved by the Taliban and Pakistan or they can just cut off access at any time. Of course if they do you can always just go back to war. Pakistan has nukes btw so that's lots of fun.

So explain to me how expending massive resources, billions upon billions of dollars, and risking WWIII is worth getting Bagram back? "We don't want China to have it" isn't a good enough reason, that ship sailed.

Seriously, just go to a map and look at Bagram which is East of Kabul and then explain to me how we maintain a base like that. Our nearest military installation of size is probably Qatar (which is a whole other issue) or maybe Diego Garcia. It's just a logistical impossibility on top of everything else. Once we left Afghanistan we weren't going to be able to get back in without a lot of pain and that juice is definitely not worth the squeeze.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26772 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

that juice is definitely not worth the squeeze.



What are we going to do there, anyway, now that we evacuated pretty much all of Central Asia? Spy on the Pakistanis? We can do that from Qatar, Bahrain, Diego Garcia, etc.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
72074 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:50 pm to
I just ignore the idiots most of the time because the auto downvotes and nothing ever good enough for the cult is annoying. Grown arse men melting on here everyday.
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8714 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

quote:
that juice is definitely not worth the squeeze.


What are we going to do there, anyway, now that we evacuated pretty much all of Central Asia? Spy on the Pakistanis? We can do that from Qatar, Bahrain, Diego Garcia, etc.


Yep, that's reason #4 or 5 why it is a stupid idea. We can't rewind the clock where we controlled Afghanistan and could do as we wished there either, it's enemy territory now.

Trump is saying it is so we can strike Chinese nuke facilities in Western China faster but realistically if it comes to that we can get here awfully quick and will do so with missiles anyway. We aren't doing a bombing run of China from Bagram in any real world scenario even if we ignore all the other insanity behind the idea.
Posted by Ribbed
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2023
2745 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

The ronfags have become nasty little bitches

Trump cultists have always been nasty little bitches. Ask their ex wives.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26772 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

We aren't doing a bombing run of China from Bagram in any real world scenario even if we ignore all the other insanity behind the idea.

Yea that will never happen. As you say, if it came to that the missiles are coming over the Arctic/North Pacific from AK or CONUS, or from subs in the IO. We aren't strafing the Uighyur camps.
This post was edited on 11/20/23 at 1:59 pm
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
72074 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Trump cultists have always been nasty little bitches


We’ve never said we haven’t. You are the ones who get mad over mean tweets then group up together to attack posters on here.
Posted by Ribbed
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2023
2745 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

We’ve never said we haven’t

There you go. A moment of truth.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
18107 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

then group up together to attack posters on here.

JFC - I couldn't write posts for you designed to make you look softer and more retarded than what you type out 25 times per day.

Anybody that says something you don't like to read is "melting" and if there's more than one of them, they're ganging up on you.

Are you working on the list of things you are critical of Trump about? The gang that's ferociously attacking you is looking forward to seeing it.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74480 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Grown arse men melting on here everyday.



Especially when they are crying all day but then claim they will vote Orange anyways

Unprincipled losers. I mean look at HHTM (Ribbed) melting also and needs Meds to cope cause of Drumpf
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262007 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 2:14 pm to
quote:


We’ve never said we haven’t.


You just follow Donny's lead. This is why he cannot get good people to work for him, nor can he get good people behind his ideas.

Your movement is self suicidal.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram