- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who built the pyramids?
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:19 am to YungBuck
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:19 am to YungBuck
quote:He's been proven wrong and had his 'theories' shoved up his arse on several occasions. He gets money by lying to stupid people.
How is he a grifter?
That's the definition of a grifter.
quote:Ah yes, this bullshite.
he proposes an alternative thought to what archeologists want us to believe
Archeologists aren't religious people. Their knowledge isn't indoctrinated into them without anything to support it. There are mountains of data, collected by thousands of people over hundreds of years of research. Do they know everything about everything? No, but Hancock, et al know NOTHING of the scientific data, and they have none of their own. They just throw out 'theories' based on conjecture and incorrect information.
But, dumbasses keep sending them money, so they have no reason to stop.
quote:Weird how the Romans and others did that very thing, that no one including your grifter heroes have ever disputed it (because it's well documented) and no one claims they had help from aliens or whatever the frick.
You act like moving 2.3 million stone blocks averaging 2.5 to 15 tons over many miles with no roads using pulleys and rolling it is plausible
quote:What? Watching Ancient Alien marathons on the History Channel? There is zero chance you've ever looked at actual archeological data.
after looking at all of the evidence
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:41 am to blueboy
quote:
No, but Hancock, et al know NOTHING of the scientific data, and they have none of their own. They just throw out 'theories' based on conjecture and incorrect information.
So when he proposed a structure such as Gobekli Tepe in 1995 and was ostracized yet a year later in 1996 he was proven right this confirms he is always incorrect? And the Romans never constructed pyramids the size of the Great pyramid, include the slope to place stones at the top and it is still unexplained. Also I never mentioned aliens and have never watched Ancient Aliens bud, but to immediately rule out a lost civilization is wild when there are tales in each society of a great flood or catastrophe, but you will dismiss it as old folk tales. Lastly, why are cities such as Derinkuyu found? I fail to see why he is a grifter other than you stating, "muh the scientific data" but carbon dating is flawed in that you must have organic material in the site to even begin to guess how old it is.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News