- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Underhill and NOF are bit shady (Penning Situation)
Posted on 10/11/23 at 5:03 pm to JonathanSidwell
Posted on 10/11/23 at 5:03 pm to JonathanSidwell
In other words, Underhill isn't allowed to change his mind about a certain player after several weeks of regular season play? Since he supported him earlier, then he is forced to always support him? That is silly message board poster logic.
4
Posted on 10/11/23 at 5:10 pm to bstaceyau19
quote:
In other words, Underhill isn't allowed to change his mind about a certain player after several weeks of regular season play? Since he supported him earlier, then he is forced to always support him? That is silly message board poster logic.
He praised Penning in an article one week ago that he actually seemed to be spot of strength in this OL. Now he's hanging him out to dry (not even a week later) just so he could get ahead of this news. It's bad journalism
Posted on 10/12/23 at 12:30 pm to bstaceyau19
quote:
In other words, Underhill isn't allowed to change his mind about a certain player after several weeks of regular season play?
Or in other other words, Underhill is your typical reporter emboldened to an organization and running propaganda for them by their directives. This is the state of the press nowadays, and it's pathetic. OP is correct: this reeks of journalistic conspiracy.
Posted on 10/13/23 at 9:16 am to bstaceyau19
“message board” and “logic” do not mix…
Posted on 10/13/23 at 5:15 pm to bstaceyau19
quote:No, sounds like he is getting info and putting out a piece that makes it look like he determined Penning had an issue just before something else comes out that he could be benched. Makes it look like he knows more about scouting when in reality, he was tipped.
In other words, Underhill isn't allowed to change his mind about a certain player after several weeks of regular season play? Since he supported him earlier, then he is forced to always support him? That is silly message board poster logic.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News