Started By
Message

re: Is there a bigger rip off than veterinarians?

Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:13 pm to
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
45137 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:13 pm to
You can post that receipt all you want. That veterinarian did not sedate the dog and extract teeth. I can assure you there were no dental x-rays, no monitoring, no fluids, no sedation drugs used, no suture used, dental machine used, etc.
Posted by BK Lounge
Member since Nov 2021
3718 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:21 pm to
I will just post this here, and im sure ill get downvoted to oblivion by baws who dont get why anyone would spend any amount of money on an animal- but fwiw i got pet insurance for my dog about 8 yrs ago and it has saved me a fortune over the years… for a while he needed surgery just about every year for tumor removals, each surgery cost about $900-$1200 and pet insurance wound up covering about 90% of that in each case.. also covered some other random things from time to time.. i will say thta his premiums rose quite a bit as he got older, so i switched carriers a couple years ago to a more reasonable cost.. still, ive done the math and ive come out way, way ahead over the years and id recommend pet insurance to anyone (and no i dont sell pet insurance or work in insurance at all lol.)
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
4524 posts
Posted on 9/1/23 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

You can post that receipt all you want. That veterinarian did not sedate the dog and extract teeth. I can assure you there were no dental x-rays, no monitoring, no fluids, no sedation drugs used, no suture used, dental machine used, etc.


Extraction may be the wrong word, but she had three teeth pulled.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram