- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New baby on the way - Whooping Cough vaccine
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:01 pm to crazy4lsu
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:01 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
You offered a definition on 'real vaccines,' you dim bulb.
No. I was asked to explain things in layman's terms as I saw them.
I could have used the lovely "blueprint" buzzword, I chose not to.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:01 pm to X123F45
quote:
Are you making the argument that all medical doctors are virology experts now?
Compared to the layperson, yes.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:03 pm to X123F45
quote:
No. I was asked to explain things in layman's terms as I saw them.
No. I said this:
quote:
Define 'real vaccines' for me in discrete terms
No where did I say I wanted it in layman's terms as 'you saw them.' You were the one who insinuated you didn't mind 'real vaccines.' I asked for your definition of 'real vaccines' and so far you've just tried to move the goalposts.
Again, you do not have an understanding of immunology, vaccinology, molecular biology, etc., to actually be able to make a caveat like that. Why you decided to is another question.
This post was edited on 8/31/23 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:04 pm to jyoung1
quote:
And aluminum?
quote:LINK
The aluminum contained in vaccines is similar to that found in a liter (about 1 quart or 32 fluid ounces) of infant formula. While infants receive about 4.4 milligrams* of aluminum in the first six months of life from vaccines, they receive more than that in their diet. Breast-fed infants ingest about 7 milligrams, formula-fed infants ingest about 38 milligrams, and infants who are fed soy formula ingest almost 117 milligrams of aluminum during the first six months of life.
If your child is fed then it will ingest Aluminum. BTW aluminum not used in live virus vaccines like such as the MMR vaccine. Therefore it is impossible for aluminum in vaccines to cause Autism since it was only the MMR vaccine that was ever linked to Autism.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:06 pm to jyoung1
quote:
My child is breastfed.
And thus has more aluminum from you than it does from vaccines.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:07 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Did you actually read the paper?
No. I opened his link. I checked funding. For giggles, I reviewed the data selection methods.
Their conclusions don't matter.
The data selections CANNOT include estimations. They admit estimations in their selections.
Estimations are a normative bias.
Everything past that point is invalid because of it.
Once again, there is no partial credit.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:09 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
No where did I say I wanted it in layman's terms as 'you saw them.'
You are correct.
I misread it as discreet.
That error is mine.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:09 pm to X123F45
quote:
No. I opened his link. I checked funding
Which again, isn't an argument. You didn't present any evidence to further your claim on this point. Since you have trouble with argumentation, do you want to know how you could have strengthened this claim?
quote:
The data selections CANNOT include estimations. They admit estimations in their selections.
You should read the paper.
quote:
Once again, there is no partial credit.
And there is no partial credit for checking the soundness of a particular claim. Do you understand how argumentation works?
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:09 pm to X123F45
quote:
Then you should leave it to the people who are (aka real doctors).
Are you making the argument that all medical doctors are virology experts now?
No. I never make arguments about ALL in anything. However the authors of the study that you object to are experts in virology. I would also like to reclassify my previous statement. I would now like it to say that you should lead it to the people who have more expertise in virology than you (aka real doctors). I am confident that any real doctor knows more about virology than you.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:10 pm to crazy4lsu
No sir, aluminum that is ingested is excreted from the body through digestive system. Aluminum that is injected is not excreted by digestive system, and studies show it becomes deposited into brain, permanently.
This post was edited on 8/31/23 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:11 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Plenty of validity to this but our authorities have done incalculable damage to this argument over the last 4 years.
MRNA vaccines are different than the regular vaccines that kids have been safely getting for decades now. I think people who conflate the two are doing it to score political points mostly.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:11 pm to X123F45
quote:
You are correct.
I misread it as discreet.
That error is mine.
You misread it as a word that doesn't even include your eventual description? Are you an idiot or just dishonest?
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:11 pm to jyoung1
quote:
My child is breastfed.
Which means your child ingested or will ingest (if your child is not 6 months old yet) 7mg of aluminum in the 1st 6 months of life.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:12 pm to X123F45
quote:
Once again, there is no partial credit.
Which is why you academics can't function in the real world.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:13 pm to jyoung1
quote:
Aluminum that is injected is not excreted by digestive system.
No, they are both excreted. You are incorrect.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:15 pm to jyoung1
quote:
Injest vs inject good sir.
One way or another it enters the blood stream.
BTW you have not addressed why you think aluminum causes Autism despite the fact that it was never an ingredient in the vaccine linked to Autism?
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:16 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
You misread it as a word that doesn't even include your eventual description?
Is subdued and unostentatious not close enough to layman's terms for you?
I must bow out. Time to deal with actual morons.
Posted on 8/31/23 at 6:18 pm to X123F45
quote:
Is subdued and unostentatious not close enough to layman's terms for you?
Oh my god. 'Careful and circumspect in one's speech' as in discreet absolutely isn't a synonym for 'a person without professional or specialized knowledge.' You are being straight up dishonest here. This is one of the more wild claims I've ever read on here. Just absolute smooth-brained nonsense.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News