Started By
Message

re: US crude output to rise to record 12.76 million bpd in 2023

Posted on 8/11/23 at 11:04 am to
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87523 posts
Posted on 8/11/23 at 11:04 am to
quote:

And meanwhile, the damn fools pulling his strings want to shutdown fracking among other advanced tools.


cwill is right in that the actual effects of the Biden Admin on the current O&G Industry has been less than we expected.

our current energy challenges are more from outside influences like Saudi/Russia and inflation


here is an old forbes article that does a pretty good job explaining it

quote:

In late 2019, as various candidates jockeyed to win the Democratic nomination for president, Elizabeth Warren made the statement that she would “ban fracking everywhere.”


quote:

Then Joe Biden came along and pandered to the same crowd Warren was trying to impress. He promised “no new fracking”, but once again I explained why that promise wouldn’t be fulfilled.



quote:

But what Biden can’t do by executive order is an overall ban on fracking, because most fracking takes place on private land. A complete ban would have to be passed by Congress, and that looks like a longshot.

For a more in-depth interpretation of Biden’s recent executive orders, I spoke with Stacey Morris, who is Director of Research for midstream index and data provider Alerian. She explained that the orders were certainly not as bad as they seemed:

“These executive orders were pretty well-telegraphed. They were even a little bit softened from what was said during the campaign. The language on the Biden website discussed banning permitting on federal land. The executive order is a pause on new leases. They aren't looking at a full out fracking ban.”

When I asked how companies might be affected, she explained “Companies have been stockpiling permits in anticipation of a move like this. Right now there are 7,700 unused permits. For example, Devon EnergyDVN +0.4% has over four years of permit backlog and drilling inventory. They expect to be able to execute on their federal lands program based on comments made in November.”

She added that some states that could be most impacted longer term are New Mexico, Wyoming, North Dakota, and Colorado. In the long run, she said that a ban on drilling on federal land could lead to more imports. In that case we could end up using oil that is produced with more associated carbon emissions than if it had been produced in the U.S.



Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 8/11/23 at 11:07 am to
quote:

our current energy challenges are more from outside influences like Saudi/Russia and inflation


Producers are being cautious bc the current bump in prices is being supported by OPEC+ cuts.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11205 posts
Posted on 8/11/23 at 11:31 am to
quote:

our current energy challenges are more from outside influences like Saudi/Russia and inflation


Umm the energy prices are the inflation

The issues with energy lie in capital markets. It’s basically uninvestable which creates a feedback loop where capital flows out of it and companies are prioritizing dividends and share buybacks over Capex so it’s capped our capacity.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram