Started By
Message

re: There is a reason young men are rejecting the Church and following guys like Andrew Tate

Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:40 am to
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
8950 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:40 am to
quote:

Dude is a massive hypocrite.


Why do people care so much, even if someone is a "hypocrite" as you say. Is it better for a bad, immoral man to deliver a good message to young people, or would you prefer a clean cut, nice man to deliver a weak, watered down message?

If the message he is giving is positive and advice that young guys need to hear, what's the problem? Why does his past behavior matter so much?
Posted by Bunkie7672
Member since Mar 2020
244 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:45 am to
Does Tate have a wife and family? I must have missed that part. He’s an Islamist grifter.
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6898 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:46 am to
The ONLY reason he is saying this now is because he got arrested and is being prosecuted. Had that not happened he would still be carrying on the same behaviors. That is a hypocrite.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425823 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Why do people care so much, even if someone is a "hypocrite" as you say

Because they are telling you what you want to believe and they don't even believe in it themselves. That's moral bankruptcy, not moral education.

I'll let you in on a secret: these content creators know their market and have adopted the message to appeal to the market. They don't really believe in this stuff. They just know it's an easy way to make money. This goes from Andrew Tate to Tim Pool to the Conservative Treehouse.

You are suckers listening to grifters intentionally feeding you red meat to consume as mindless NPCs
Posted by Motownsix
Boise
Member since Oct 2022
1982 posts
Posted on 8/5/23 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Why do people care so much, even if someone is a "hypocrite" as you say. Is it better for a bad, immoral man to deliver a good message to young people, or would you prefer a clean cut, nice man to deliver a weak, watered down message? If the message he is giving is positive and advice that young guys need to hear, what's the problem? Why does his past behavior matter so much?


Messages are just words if the speaker has no credibility.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram