Started By
Message

re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"

Posted on 7/8/23 at 5:43 am to
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
11013 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 5:43 am to
quote:

You also seem to be much more upset about qanon than child traffickers

I'm not "upset" at all.
look at your posts in this thread. You spend 90% of them complaining that Q conspiracies are the problem and not the actual traffickers. Its really crazy to see someone deflect this much

quote:

Why are you resorting to such dishonest arguments?

When did you stop abusing your children?
you might have some undiagnosed mental problems tbh
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424628 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:01 am to
quote:

look at your posts in this thread.

OK

quote:

. You spend 90% of them complaining

You've already started lying

quote:

that Q conspiracies are the problem and not the actual traffickers

Quote me where I said this, specifically. Not an inference/interpretation. Where I stated this.

quote:

you might have some undiagnosed mental problems tbh

You might need to educate yourself on simple concepts. That's an example of a loaded question. The one used more in common vernacular is "When did you stop beating your wife?", but I made it more specifically relevant to this topic.

The dishonesty involved in a loaded question fallacy is the reliance on an untrue declaration/assumption/presumption that effectively walls in the response. Since you probably need more explanation, I'll use the example you quoted:

When did you stop abusing your children?

The dishonest declaration/assumption/presumption was the fact that you abuse your children. See how it boxes in any legitimate response?

Or, I can use the quote to which I responded when giving that example:

You also seem to be much more upset about qanon than child traffickers

It's not a perfect comparison b/c it's not a "question", but it uses the same dishonest framing technique.

The irony is, you continued to do this with the very post to which I'm responding, as quoted above:

You spend 90% of them complaining that Q conspiracies are the problem and not the actual traffickers.

Or you can go back to the post I responded to prior to your injection to see more examples:

Leave it to liberals to down play child sex trafficking

That quote involves TWO dishonesties.

And my response remains more true than ever (since more posters are relying even more on dishonest framing/arguments):

quote:

The beginning of that plan requires using proper terminology and discussing this honestly, which you jut showed you're either unwilling or unable to do. That ties into the Q stuff, b/c that stupidity, again, has created a lot of dishonest arguments and beliefs around the issue and ignores the reality, which means any desire coming from that dishonesty has little chance of doing anything.

You're then left with Leftist-style virtue signaling.


fin
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
18080 posts
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:49 am to
quote:

You spend 90% of them complaining that Q conspiracies are the problem and not the actual traffickers. Its really crazy to see someone deflect this much


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram