- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Some facts from Kari Lake court case today. 170k signatures "verified" at a 99.97% rate
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:23 pm
quote:
Kari Lake’s attorney, Kurt Olsen: “11 of the signature verification workers approved 170k signatures at a rate of less than 0 and 2.99 seconds with a 99.97% approval rating.”
LINK
One guy approved 100% of 26K by him self.. .. He was just clicking the button.
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:25 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Some facts from Kari Lake court case today. 170k signatures "verified" at a 99.97% rate
they will admit it is suspicious, but then say it doesnt prove anything was done wrong, signatures were verified, so no standing, kari you lose
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:29 pm to Jjdoc
All that needs to be done is a careful and honest re-evaluation of signature matching. Last I read, it takes more than a few seconds to call up a signature to compare it to the registration attached to a ballot. 20 to 30 seconds seemed to be the fastest unless those government computers and network were blazingly fast and automatically recognized the registrations to be instantly called up.
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:32 pm to Jjdoc
Are those ballots still available to be examined?
Seems her team could do their own verification of signatures and see how badly this was bothced.
Seems her team could do their own verification of signatures and see how badly this was bothced.
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:39 pm to Jjdoc
If fraud is found, I hope each of those “workers” spend some time in jail. A message needs to be sent
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:41 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
All that needs to be done is a careful and honest re-evaluation of signature matching.
that requires the desire and intent to seek to find the truth, they know it was complete fraud and they wont look into it because they dont want to look into it to find the truth
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:45 pm to mtntiger
quote:I know at one point not too long ago her law team was denied the right to view the ballots to actually look at signatures. Not sure if that's still the case though.
Seems her team could do their own verification of signatures and see how badly this was bothced.
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:46 pm to keakar
quote:
they will admit it is suspicious, but then say it doesnt prove anything was done wrong, signatures were verified, so no standing, kari you lose
Actually, this was a result of the AZ Supreme court telling them to get it right.
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:57 pm to Jjdoc
Ya don't see the scrolling down function ...
BINGO!!
In other words, they did not even compare the sigs ...
BINGO!!
In other words, they did not even compare the sigs ...
Posted on 5/17/23 at 6:00 pm to Jjdoc
What else do they need? There’s video proof of people just clicking through images at the speed of light.
Posted on 5/17/23 at 6:03 pm to Jjdoc
Kari Lake won.
Donald Trump won.
Will Jeff Landry?
Donald Trump won.
Will Jeff Landry?
Popular
Back to top
