Started By
Message
locked post

Russian High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) weapons.

Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:31 pm
Posted by LookSquirrel
Old Millville
Member since Oct 2019
7654 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:31 pm
Slow day. This might spice things up.

1/8 There's a narrative that the US is militarily superior to Russia (and probably also China). Many people in the West and particularly those living in NATO countries take comfort from this. But it may not be true. Let's leave aside for now the question of whether...

2/8 Russia has a larger, more advanced, modern and capable nuclear and anti-ballistic missile fleet (which it almost certainly does but which creates many hot collars) and touch on a subject that very few people are aware of and which the media almost never talks about. What...

3/8 if Russia could effectively at will wreck the entire electrical and electronic infrastructure - every single device, every single piece of equipment - of the entire continental United States, including (almost) all of its military and including ballistic missile...

4 through 8 in thread.

Chamberlain's Ghost

Key Judgments.

From Dr. Peter Vincent Pry
Executive Director
EMP Task Force on National and Homeland Security
January 2021





Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
53709 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:37 pm to
It's hard to believe the US military has any huge and decisive advantage over China or Russia in a pure technological sense. The Chinese and Russians have had a shite ton of college students in our best STEM universities for decades and both governments have obtained a lot of technology from US corporations as a condition of allowing US corporations in China and Russia.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15005 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Slow day.


Not for USSC.

quote:

There is currently a rather large US Strategic Command exercise underway involving at least 10 B-52H, at least 16 tankers and an E-4B Nightwatch, all from USAF Global Strike Command. There are also four US Navy E-6B TACAMOs airborne
Posted by Wee Ice Mon
Member since May 2014
1815 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:40 pm to
Member when Biden gave Putin the list of key US infrastructure not to touch? I member

LINK
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17670 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:44 pm to


Doesn't the US have these subs, each capable of destroying Russia, I mean TOTAL DESTRUCTION, several times over.

I also mean EACH.

It amazes me to think how much money all of us spend just to get along.
This post was edited on 4/16/23 at 2:48 pm
Posted by LookSquirrel
Old Millville
Member since Oct 2019
7654 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Doesn't the US have these subs, each capable of destroying Russia, I mean TOTAL DESTRUCTION, several times over.


According to Dr. Peter Vincent Pry
Executive Director EMP Task Force on National and Homeland Security, that would include our subs.



including (almost) all of its military and including ballistic missile...

4/8 submarines at sea in a single strike or a series of closely co-ordinated strikes and the United States was unable to defend itself against such a strike?

As it turns out, that may well be exactly the case.

In January 2021 the US Govt published its own report...
Posted by scurvydawg
College Station
Member since Sep 2018
130 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:50 pm to
Former Navy here. Our subs are our best deterrent and can virtually take out all of Russia's capability to wage war.

Also want to point out that our surface ships are equipped to manage an EMP blast without any issues. I would suspect our ground forces and equipment are as well.

That said, civilian protection of power grids virtually does not exist and if they emp'd us, it would be chaos within 3 days. Imagine folks in Houston who are used to getting food at McD's and have no food in their homes not able to eat. Wild west...
Posted by LookSquirrel
Old Millville
Member since Oct 2019
7654 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Not for USSC.


What's up with that?

No pun intended.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42362 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:53 pm to
HEMP?


Farout, man!
Posted by Shepherd88
Member since Dec 2013
4880 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:57 pm to
I’m almost positive fiber optic cable systems are not sensitive to EMP or gamma radiation. I’ve talked to some guys with ATT about this before and they were telling me about it.

New grid technology is concerned about this from the stand point of solar flares mostly.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42003 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:58 pm to
If we go hot war with Russia and china or an combination

Regardless of winner / loser

Rank and file quality of life is going to be loser
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15005 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

What's up with that?


IDK, but why do we know if it's really something?

https://mobile.twitter.com/vcdgf555/status/1647650760354562048
Posted by Tusksup
Sheridan, AR
Member since Feb 2023
1520 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 3:00 pm to
FTR... Only things with power going through it when an emp detonates will be damaged.
Posted by LookSquirrel
Old Millville
Member since Oct 2019
7654 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Also want to point out that our surface ships are equipped to manage an EMP blast without any issues. I would suspect our ground forces and equipment are as well.


The report goes on to say this.

Russia has “Super-EMP” weapons specialized for HEMP attack that potentially generate 100,000
volts/meter or higher, greatly exceeding the U.S. military hardening standard (50,000 volts/meter).

quote:

That said, civilian protection of power grids virtually does not exist and if they emp'd us, it would be chaos within 3 days. Imagine folks in Houston who are used to getting food at McD's and have no food in their homes not able to eat. Wild west...


It also details how they could limit the affects to target specific targets, unlike the blanket EMP, more commonly known.

That said, I hope you are right and the good doctor, of "Homeland Security", is wrong.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 3:03 pm to
I read a report once that stated, in general, older vehicles are better against EMP. They rely less on electronics.

We need to harden the nation against EMP issues. This is part of my platform.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17670 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

In January 2021 the US Govt published its own report...


They be tryin' to raise sum mo mony based on yo fear.
Posted by LookSquirrel
Old Millville
Member since Oct 2019
7654 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 3:07 pm to
"Was pretty surprised when I hopped on adsb. Those guys are pretending to nuke the world right now. There's even a propaganda plane over Erie, PA and lake Erie right now."
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15005 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Only things with power going through it when an emp detonates will be damaged.


I have read that the magnetic field could be strong enough to generate current strong enough to over amp dormant circuits also.
It's all based on capacity, shielding and proximity.
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
10519 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 3:08 pm to
Russia struggled to invade Ukraine at the beginning with old tanks and equipment.

This does not mean they are weak, but I certainly don’t think they are superior. But they do have a lot of nukes, so…
Posted by Tusksup
Sheridan, AR
Member since Feb 2023
1520 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

If we go hot war with Russia and china or an combination

Regardless of winner / loser

Rank and file quality of life is going to be loser

Duh
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram