Started By
Message

re: Famed atheist and biologist calls the idea of more than two genders “utter nonsense”

Posted on 3/24/23 at 6:02 pm to
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7438 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

His implied belief is if bathrooms were meant to be segregated based on biological sex and not social gender, the little stick figures would have a penis or vagina instead of a dress or slacks


Nope, my knowledge, based on facts which are undeniable, is a public restroom has no biological sex. We designate that bathrooms gender because gender is soicietal and cultural….sex is a biological fact
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63483 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

a public restroom has no biological sex.


What does this even mean?

The bathroom has no sex. It's a room. It's segregated based on sex. That's why there are 0.0 urinals (aka toilets for dick owners) in any public women's restroom anywhere in the world.
Posted by calcotron
Member since Nov 2007
8336 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

facts which are undeniable


You definitely don't know what this means or when to use it.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65036 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

gender is soicietal and cultural….sex is a biological fact


This is pure bullshite and you’re feeble minded enough to have fallen for it.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
5784 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

Nope, my knowledge, based on facts which are undeniable, is a public restroom has no biological sex. We designate that bathrooms gender because gender is soicietal and cultural….sex is a biological fact


So all those long lines for women’s bathrooms in superdome weren’t about not having pee troughs along the walls???

The 19th amendment and the long attempted ERA must have included “on the account of gender”…

Societies make laws, and besides the above up until some recent judicial attempts to redefine sex and legislate the term sex has had some important usage in the Title Civil Rights Acts and in other laws. Guessing you would agree that a judge redefining long standing term like sex in these laws goes against biological facts. Hoping Title IX challenges are handled better by the Supremes than the federal work place Title decision. Just because words can be redefine by the elites in power doesn’t mean it’s correct or accurate.

In studies, articles, reports, and so on Gender has included cultural and societal influences within one’s biological sex including roles or expectations that might or might not fit within biological differences, advantages, or limitations, but gender’s basis was biological sex which is why transgender was used to describe those who self-identified as something different than their gender. A male or female’s Gender fluidity including roles and culture defined masculine/feminine traits stopped at its respective biological sex, and that also makes sex the better term to use in law and to apply with any mention of men or women in laws and regulations. Using gender in a law shouldn’t supersede one’s biological sex, but it can add confusion to which party’s view of definition of gender traits or roles should take precedence in a dispute over law as well when one can change said definition (individuals, businesses, corporations, and so on not political parties).
This post was edited on 3/24/23 at 9:58 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram