- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stolen History - Lifting the Veil of Deception (Doc Part 1 - Introduction)
Posted on 3/8/23 at 2:05 pm to dr
Posted on 3/8/23 at 2:05 pm to dr
quote:By "fine lines" you mean the sketch?
the fine lines are drawn in this
quote:You understand that a huge number of major works have undergone reflectography or radiography?
unfortunately, I have no paintings of that age to submit, hence "moderately provable"
No.
Nevermind, obviously you don't.
So, for clarification, there are techniques used to detect forgeries that quite easily disprove old paintings as touched up photographs.
Scientists historically acted like scientists. They made observations, formed hypotheses, tested them, and documented everything they did. It's how we can track when photography was first attempted, why it failed, and when it first succeeded. The fact tree trunks are round, and were abundantly available to pre-Columbian (Ah! There that "mysterious" 'Columbia' word again) aboriginals, does not mean they discovered the wheel. They had the resources. They had the skill. They did not have the wheel.
Nor did anyone from the 16th, 17th or 18th century have a photograph. Nor is the earth flat. Sorry.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 2:30 pm to NC_Tigah
Official history Photography wasn't really a scientific endeavor. I find it rather colorful, little tinkerers and big companies mostly in France USA and Britain stealing and trying to one-up each other with the next big thing. They didn't have this conception of this grand scientific method, they certainly didn't document it and not with any academic rigor, not as a rule. But it's just common logic and sense, the "scientific method". Many, like Daguerre, were uneducated tradesmen. It was an endeavor of craft, art and capitalism. They were trying to make money more than anything.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 2:33 pm to NC_Tigah
as your reading comprehension is questionable, let me re-state
was it silver or nitric silver crystals ?
should I say it slower, or use pictures
neither of those tests would tell the difference between (repeat after me)
nitric silver crystals or silver
"It's how we can track when photography was first attempted"
no, not really, but you are all knowing so...
by the way, and are you a scientist? I am. You are just an armchair google meister
was it silver or nitric silver crystals ?
should I say it slower, or use pictures
neither of those tests would tell the difference between (repeat after me)
nitric silver crystals or silver
"It's how we can track when photography was first attempted"
no, not really, but you are all knowing so...
by the way, and are you a scientist? I am. You are just an armchair google meister
This post was edited on 3/8/23 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 3/8/23 at 2:41 pm to NC_Tigah
additionally, lets recap a bit
why did the one building at the fair COMPLEX NOT catch fire while everything else was on fire?
How did a plaster structure survive 30 years of chicago winter?
How come you have to jump to another post without addressing the questions posted to your replys?
you can move along now, the adults are actually discussing interesting things, and you contribute very little as far as constructive stuff, but if you want to post pictures and books like you did, that is welcome
why did the one building at the fair COMPLEX NOT catch fire while everything else was on fire?
How did a plaster structure survive 30 years of chicago winter?
How come you have to jump to another post without addressing the questions posted to your replys?
you can move along now, the adults are actually discussing interesting things, and you contribute very little as far as constructive stuff, but if you want to post pictures and books like you did, that is welcome
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News