- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Tuck Going Off About Intel Agencies
Posted on 2/4/23 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 2/4/23 at 12:30 pm
Last month Tuck did a podcast with Tulsi. In one part he discussed the IC and his well publicized run in with the NSA.
But he said two things I hadn't heard before:
1) He said he talked to the head of the House intel committee and that guy refuses to communicate over text because "NSA reads my texts." Tuck was surprised that a Congressman would tolerate it, but he said the guy was just acting like it was par for the course. Every person in Congress just assumes all their comms are being monitored by the IC. Remember, the intel committees (both House and Senate) exist to oversee and regulate the IC. And yet the IC spies on them.
2) Tuck said that Rep. Michael McCaul told him that the intel agencies told him (McCaul) that they believe Tuck is a Russian asset. So we have the intel agencies openly spying on a private citizen (Tuck) and telling people in Congress during secret intel briefings that Tuck is working for Russia.
Our problem in America is not the military so much as it is the IC. Instead of military industrial complex, what we actually have is an "Intelligence Industrial Complex." They run the country, have no oversight, and get to spend countless billions in tax payer dollars to achieve their goals. (And most of their budgets are "black" meaning classified).
Youtube Clip
But he said two things I hadn't heard before:
1) He said he talked to the head of the House intel committee and that guy refuses to communicate over text because "NSA reads my texts." Tuck was surprised that a Congressman would tolerate it, but he said the guy was just acting like it was par for the course. Every person in Congress just assumes all their comms are being monitored by the IC. Remember, the intel committees (both House and Senate) exist to oversee and regulate the IC. And yet the IC spies on them.
2) Tuck said that Rep. Michael McCaul told him that the intel agencies told him (McCaul) that they believe Tuck is a Russian asset. So we have the intel agencies openly spying on a private citizen (Tuck) and telling people in Congress during secret intel briefings that Tuck is working for Russia.
Our problem in America is not the military so much as it is the IC. Instead of military industrial complex, what we actually have is an "Intelligence Industrial Complex." They run the country, have no oversight, and get to spend countless billions in tax payer dollars to achieve their goals. (And most of their budgets are "black" meaning classified).
Youtube Clip
6
Posted on 2/4/23 at 12:36 pm to AUstar
I guess this is what happens when all we care about is the 2nd Amendment, so we allow the Republicans to take our 4th Amendment rights away via the War on Drugs, the Patriot Act and stacking the USSC to overturn a previous decision that Americans have a protected right to privacy.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 12:36 pm to AUstar
Labeling anyone a Russian asset gives them reason to spy. Circular policy world.
Keeping its own existence is priority #1 with any bureaucracy
Keeping its own existence is priority #1 with any bureaucracy
Posted on 2/4/23 at 12:40 pm to Padme
I’m surprised they didn’t go with the “suspected domestic terrorist” label, but I guess “he’s a Russian!” gets them the surveillance green light just as easily.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 12:40 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:your rant fails to account for why our intelligence agencies have been weaponized against only one side of the political spectrum instead of all of us.
I guess this is what happens when all we care about is the 2nd Amendment, so we allow the Republicans to take our 4th Amendment rights away via the War on Drugs, the Patriot Act and stacking the USSC to overturn a previous decision that Americans have a protected right to privacy.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 12:44 pm to AUstar
quote:
Last month Tuck did a podcast with Tulsi.
Tucker is discussing and going places I thought were impossible within the "Legacy Media" -- the man is a Lion. (Now is ANYONE who can affect change able to do anything about it??)
Regarding Tucker and Tulsi; He really needs to have Tusli address her involvement in the WEF -- and whether she is still down with their agenda (as one of their "Young Leaders" at one time.)
IS she or isn't she still involved with the WEF?
Posted on 2/4/23 at 12:51 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
why our intelligence agencies have been weaponized against only one side of the political spectrum
You're not listening.
Democrats want to erode your rights.
Republicans want to erode your rights.
Is there some other side?
Posted on 2/4/23 at 12:54 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:your original post seems to have left off any reference to the former but was all abou the latter. I'm sure that was an oversight
You're not listening.
Democrats want to erode your rights.
Republicans want to erode your rights
Posted on 2/4/23 at 12:55 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I guess this is what happens when all we care about is the 2nd Amendment, so we allow the Republicans to take our 4th Amendment rights away via the War on Drugs, the Patriot Act and stacking the USSC to overturn a previous decision that Americans have a protected right to privacy.
You don't even realize how stupid you are.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 1:00 pm to AUstar
quote:
Our problem in America is not the military so much as it is the IC. Instead of military industrial complex, what we actually have is an "Intelligence Industrial Complex." They run the country, have no oversight, and get to spend countless billions in tax payer dollars to achieve their goals. (And most of their budgets are "black" meaning classified).
Posted on 2/4/23 at 1:04 pm to Liberator
quote:
Regarding Tucker and Tulsi; He really needs to have Tusli address her involvement in the WEF -- and whether she is still down with their agenda (as one of their "Young Leaders" at one time.)
IS she or isn't she still involved with the WEF?
Taqiyya?
Posted on 2/4/23 at 1:43 pm to 93and99
Let me guess, you keep voting for Republicans thinking they're defending your Constitutional rights, correct?
Posted on 2/4/23 at 1:48 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
your original post seems to have left off any reference to the former but was all about the latter. I'm sure that was an oversight
It's because I'm talking to a bunch of Republicans. I'm not here to tell you Democrats are bad, you already know that.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 1:50 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:according to you democrats don't either. But i still haven't noticed any specific complaints about them from you so should we vote for them instead?
Let me guess, you keep voting for Republicans thinking they're defending your Constitutional rights, correct?
Posted on 2/4/23 at 1:51 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I'm not here to tell you Democrats are bad,
You said they don't care about our rights. That seems bad. What rights have they taken away?
Posted on 2/4/23 at 1:53 pm to AUstar
I believe we will eventually find out an American version of the Stasi exists.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 1:53 pm to AUstar
The only way to rein them in by cutting off their lifeblood.
Can't spy on anyone if you're not feeding the family and the lights are off. Defund the frick out of these assholes.
I would push a sycophant off the Trump train for a seat if Trump took this cause up. I wouldn't care how much an establishment stooge he was otherwise - just put the IC back in a box and get us TF out of Ukraine.
Can't spy on anyone if you're not feeding the family and the lights are off. Defund the frick out of these assholes.
I would push a sycophant off the Trump train for a seat if Trump took this cause up. I wouldn't care how much an establishment stooge he was otherwise - just put the IC back in a box and get us TF out of Ukraine.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 1:55 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
What rights have they taken away?
Democrats tend to want to trade liberty for security. They would repeal the 2nd Amendment if they could. As it stands, they are generally limited to simply infringing on the 2A.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 3:24 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:so nothing about the weaponization of intelligence agencies or arresting parents at school board meetings or kicking down the doors of anyone who disagrees with the progressive agenda. Your only complaint is that they are infringing on the one freedom that you said Republicans are too preoccupied with trying to protect. That's actually hilarious. Your one example of their oppression is the one you want us to ignore. Lol fricking lol
Democrats tend to want to trade liberty for security. They would repeal the 2nd Amendment if they could. As it stands, they are generally limited to simply infringing on the 2A.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 3:42 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I guess this is what happens when all we care about is the 2nd Amendment, so we allow the Republicans to take our 4th Amendment rights away via the War on Drugs, the Patriot Act and stacking the USSC to overturn a previous decision that Americans have a protected right to privacy.
Now do the Jan 6 Cmte
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News