Started By
Message

re: BayouTraditions and similar NIL “collectives” are offensive.

Posted on 2/1/23 at 7:31 pm to
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
23394 posts
Posted on 2/1/23 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

This does not make sense. The P5 is going to sever ties with schools? The SEC football teams won't represent the schools in the SEC? Even if they broke away, they are still subject to anti-trust laws. Breaking away does not solve the problems.


Officially severing any remaining budgetary and oversight ties and operating completely outside of the universities is the only way to get away from Title IX. Even if the P5 pulls away from the NCAA (which has been threatened many times for leverage, even if just as a nuclear option), that still doesn’t solve the Title IX issue.

As for the cosmetics, I’m sure schools would just license the names, logos, etc back from the school and lease the facilities for basically nothing. And I’m sure many would continue to pay money back to the schools like the LSU Athletic Dept already does. Everything would look and operate the same minus the G5. This would get around T9 and allow for collective bargaining, contracts, etc.

As for your comments on anti-trust, the pro leagues are exempted from anti-trust issues and if the P5 began to operate as a separate entity, they would most likely be treated the same. Such a move wouldn’t happen unless the university presidents knew going in that it would all work legally.

If we are being honest, it wouldn’t be as big of a structural change as you might think. The football staff and operations are already funded outside of the university. They would just have to separate football and possibly men’s basketball from the rest of the athletic dept and they can get all the way there.

I hope this never happens, but it’s possible if things get bad enough. And again, it’s probably simpler and definitely faster than the legislative and legal route to changing Title IX.
This post was edited on 2/1/23 at 7:41 pm
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27889 posts
Posted on 2/1/23 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

I’m sure schools would just license the names, logos, etc back and lease the facilities for basically nothing.
Why are you sure of this?
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28352 posts
Posted on 2/1/23 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

If we are being honest, it wouldn’t be as big of a structural change as you might think. The football staff and operations are already funded outside of the university. They would just have to separate football and possibly men’s basketball from the rest of the athletic dept and they can get all the way there.

The very thought of that is absurd. If it ever got to that point it would be ballgame over for the whole shooting match, there are so many problems I don’t even know where to begin.
1. Would it no longer be mandatory kids go to school?
2. What would happen to the smaller d1 teams?
3. Why as an lsu alum would I care to support the Baton Rouge tigers, or whatever they name the band of mercenaries they have on the field.
4. In most minor league situations, winning takes a back seat to development.
5. What would happen to kids not thought of as nfl material?
This post was edited on 2/1/23 at 9:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram