- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Someone explain the "neutral site" reasoning for me.
Posted on 1/23/23 at 9:45 am to mdomingue
Posted on 1/23/23 at 9:45 am to mdomingue
quote:
You can't assume anything, that is my point.
And they did not, KC was the 1 seed and got the bye plus an easier opponent in the division round because they had the best record.
quote:
Again, why one and not the other?
They went by the record for the seeds. The only difference was the neutral site for the CCG and that’s because Buffalo had the tie breaker on KC if both finished with the same record.
I’m not saying I agree with it, KC should just have been the 1 seed and host It wasn’t that big of a deal but I understand why they “compromised”.
This post was edited on 1/23/23 at 10:20 am
1
Posted on 1/23/23 at 10:15 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
but I understand why they “compromised”.
I guess I do too but it just seems like it was convenient that they arranged this about the time there was some talk about neutral site games for the conference championships in the future. Not sure the talk was anything realistic but there was some.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News