Started By
Message

re: Update on Will Wade Sanctions - Won't Receive Show Cause

Posted on 1/21/23 at 8:48 pm to
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
23749 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

He paid a person who was believed to have influenced a recruit. Goes back to my point of usable evidence. Someone’s belief is not usable, they would need someone with actual knowledge to connect the dots. The NCAA didn’t have that. You have literally made my point.


You are fricking delusional. That’s STILL a Level 1 violation. The NCAA views paying a handler and paying players as basically the same (at least pre-NIL).

And you are acting like the NCAA is a fricking court of law. They aren’t. Their “rules” on evidence are what they want them to be. They stretch the truth and use witness statements as gospel all the time.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279445 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

You are fricking delusional.


5 year ls later & it’s the same delusional group of posters in denial
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
8540 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

You are fricking delusional. That’s STILL a Level 1 violation. The NCAA views paying a handler and paying players as basically the same (at least pre-NIL).

And you are acting like the NCAA is a fricking court of law. They aren’t. Their “rules” on evidence are what they want them to be. They stretch the truth and use witness statements as gospel all the time.


You’re the gift that keeps giving. Please keep posting, you are showing how stupid you are.

Yes, the NCAA has bylaws that, among other things, control what type of information that can be used to issue the finding of a violation. One of the prohibited categories of information is anonymous sourced information. Seriously, google NCAA committee on infractions bylaws. Educate yourself before you make stupid statements again.

The NCAA is actually in a much worse position than a court, because they do not have subpoena power. The only people they can require to answer questions is players and coaches and university officials. That is why they cannot connect the dots between a “recruiter“ and a payment from a coach.

ETA. Downvote away, you’ve proven how little you know.
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 9:00 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram