- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you're wondering what's going on in Minnesota
Posted on 1/13/23 at 10:26 am to Bard
Posted on 1/13/23 at 10:26 am to Bard
quote:
The mall is private property, they can have whatever dumbass rules they want.
This is what Democratss were posting in the comments which is not surprising since it's the same argument they made for Walgreens in the '50s.
This post was edited on 1/13/23 at 10:28 am
Posted on 1/13/23 at 10:26 am to squid_hunt
Even IF the guy had been sidewalk (Mall) preaching earlier, that's still not the case being made against him. The CLAIMS were that he was soliciting. Every logo and brand T-Shirt or apparel is some form of solicitation. That alone isn't enough.
He's being harrassed for his religion. Now do the same for every Burka wearing Betty in the MoA.
He's being harrassed for his religion. Now do the same for every Burka wearing Betty in the MoA.
Posted on 1/13/23 at 10:27 am to squid_hunt
It says people were complaining about the shirt.
I hope those folks get hit by a bus.
I hope those folks get hit by a bus.
Posted on 1/13/23 at 10:28 am to Adajax
He should just tell the rent-a-cops that he was baking a gay wedding cake, and they'd leave him alone.
Because private businesses can do whatever they want, right?
Posted on 1/13/23 at 10:29 am to oogabooga68
quote:
I hope those folks get hit by a bus.
Not very Christian of you!
I 100% agree
Posted on 1/13/23 at 10:34 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Was he preaching, or was he minding his own business wearing a shirt?
Rent a cops are the worst kind of failures.
Rent a cops are the worst kind of failures.
Posted on 1/13/23 at 10:37 am to ob1pimpbobi
The Bible says to count it all joy.
Posted on 1/13/23 at 11:07 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Twitter Video: Mall Cop Gets Tuff Over Jesus Saves T-Shirt
Wow, what bigoted progressives. Bigots gonna bigot. What else would you expect from the party of the KKK? How long before the attempted genocide of straight christian white males? Lets face it, its what the left does...separate and slaughter in mass. First they have to vilify. Check that box.
Posted on 1/13/23 at 11:09 am to squid_hunt
I'm just surprised he's scolding a black fella.
This post was edited on 1/13/23 at 11:12 am
Posted on 1/13/23 at 11:19 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
can they kick the guy out because he's black instead of because of his shirt?
I went back and looked over the Civil Rights Act before responding to you. For some reason I thought the Act covered only race and national origin but I was wrong, the CRA bars a business from discriminating based on religion.
Looks like that gentleman has a solid Civil Rights Act violation he should ...Act... on.
This post was edited on 1/13/23 at 11:21 am
Posted on 1/13/23 at 11:23 am to the_truman_shitshow
quote:
So the 1st Amendment only applies when one is not a Christian.
quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Not the government doing this reprehensible deed.
Posted on 1/13/23 at 11:29 am to GeauxTigerTM
The mall is private property so it is their call...
Have you never read one sentence of actual law?
Civil rights of 1964?
Ku Klux Klan act of 1871?
You have the right to full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services,
facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of
public accommodation.
What is a public accommodation?
While a facility may be owned privately, does not automatically make it an independent law making body, that can deny equal access, enjoyment, and use of the facility.
You would do well to educate yourself on what actually is law, and what is actually supposition.
While hospitals, nothing else appearing, would appear not to be within the meaning of the term "public accommodation" as used in the statute1 prohibiting discrimination or segregation in public accommodations,2 a hospital that contained a snack bar was held to be a covered establishment under the Title II provision3 prohibiting discrimination or segregation in noncovered establishments which either contain or are contained within covered establishments.4
Rogers v. Provident Hospital, 241 F. Supp. 633 (N.D. Ill. 1965).
As to public accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, see Am. Jur. 2d, Americans with Disabilities Act §§ 627 to 647.
You can be an atheist all you want, that doesn't resolve you from actually knowing the law or the responsibility thereof.
Way too many people in current society believe they know something, when in fact they no nothing...kinda like your assertion that you are an atheist that believes in nothing, however, you have an inner held conviction of atheism, which is a protected activity...
The Free Exercise Clause does not merely extend to the protection of orthodox religious beliefs and practices but also protects unorthodox religious beliefs and most practices13 and the right to hold no religious belief, as well.14
U.S. v. Ballard, 322 U.S. 78, 64 S. Ct. 882, 88 L. Ed. 1148 (1944); Follett v. Town of McCormick, S.C., 321 U.S. 573, 64 S. Ct. 717, 88 L. Ed. 938, 152 A.L.R. 317 (1944); Murdock v. Com. of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, 63 S. Ct. 870, 87 L. Ed. 1292, 146 A.L.R. 81 (1943).
City ordinances which regulated the practice of animal sacrifice but which effectively prohibited only animal sacrifice as practiced by the Saneria religion were violative of the Free Exercise Clause. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 113 S. Ct. 2217, 124 L. Ed. 2d 472 (1993).
Have you never read one sentence of actual law?
Civil rights of 1964?
Ku Klux Klan act of 1871?
You have the right to full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services,
facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of
public accommodation.
What is a public accommodation?
While a facility may be owned privately, does not automatically make it an independent law making body, that can deny equal access, enjoyment, and use of the facility.
You would do well to educate yourself on what actually is law, and what is actually supposition.
While hospitals, nothing else appearing, would appear not to be within the meaning of the term "public accommodation" as used in the statute1 prohibiting discrimination or segregation in public accommodations,2 a hospital that contained a snack bar was held to be a covered establishment under the Title II provision3 prohibiting discrimination or segregation in noncovered establishments which either contain or are contained within covered establishments.4
Rogers v. Provident Hospital, 241 F. Supp. 633 (N.D. Ill. 1965).
As to public accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, see Am. Jur. 2d, Americans with Disabilities Act §§ 627 to 647.
You can be an atheist all you want, that doesn't resolve you from actually knowing the law or the responsibility thereof.
Way too many people in current society believe they know something, when in fact they no nothing...kinda like your assertion that you are an atheist that believes in nothing, however, you have an inner held conviction of atheism, which is a protected activity...
The Free Exercise Clause does not merely extend to the protection of orthodox religious beliefs and practices but also protects unorthodox religious beliefs and most practices13 and the right to hold no religious belief, as well.14
U.S. v. Ballard, 322 U.S. 78, 64 S. Ct. 882, 88 L. Ed. 1148 (1944); Follett v. Town of McCormick, S.C., 321 U.S. 573, 64 S. Ct. 717, 88 L. Ed. 938, 152 A.L.R. 317 (1944); Murdock v. Com. of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, 63 S. Ct. 870, 87 L. Ed. 1292, 146 A.L.R. 81 (1943).
City ordinances which regulated the practice of animal sacrifice but which effectively prohibited only animal sacrifice as practiced by the Saneria religion were violative of the Free Exercise Clause. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 113 S. Ct. 2217, 124 L. Ed. 2d 472 (1993).
Posted on 1/13/23 at 11:36 am to squid_hunt
It’s Minnesota, the state that wants to ban Christians, Muslims, and Jews from teaching in public schools.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News