Can you imagine being so pigheadedly determined to be “proven right” on this affair that you feel compelled to continually defend the bottomless grift that feeds our nation’s national security apparatus? No wonder SloMo appears increasingly unhinged — it must suck to be that person.

Yet it appears we have at least shifted his opinion on the war in the hinterlands of Eastern Europe from being a Holy & Righteous cause to acknowledging that it is a small time grift. I guess that is progress of sorts.

See baws and bawettes? Our finely tuned and unassailable arguments on this matter are indeed changing hearts and minds!

Most excellent! Keep up the good work!

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by SlowFlowPro

Simple Solutions to Complex Probs

Member since Jan 2004

424432 posts

Posted on 12/31/22 at 2:51 pm to Toomer Deplorable

quote:
Can you imagine being so pigheadedly determined to be “proven right” on this affair

For a guy who was absolutely owned yesterday, you may want to look in the mirror

quote:
you feel compelled to continually defend the bottomless grift that feeds our nation’s national security apparatus?

Um, where am I doing that?

quote:
Yet it appears we have at least shifted his opinion on the war in the hinterlands of Eastern Europe from being a Holy & Righteous cause to acknowledging that it is a small time grift. I guess that is progress of sorts.

Uh, no. I said if the donations were a grift, they don't' come close to totaling "billions", as alleged.

People keep throwing out these claims without any evidence. At best they link something unrelated (Ukraine charity) that doesn't fit their claim at all.

Your cartoon is out-dated. He's been arrested and is about to plead guilty for his crimes.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Pecker

Rocky Top

Member since May 2015

16674 posts

Posted on 1/1/23 at 12:02 pm to Toomer Deplorable

quote:
Can you imagine being so pigheadedly determined to be “proven right” on this affair that you feel compelled to continually defend the bottomless grift that feeds our nation’s national security apparatus? No wonder SloMo appears increasingly unhinged — it must suck to be that person.

I think he just refuses to accept claims of conspiracy unless there is undeniable evidence from credible sources. I think where you two fundamentally disagree is on the definitions of “undeniable evidence” and “credible sources”. I’m not of the belief that there isn’t broader and deeper conspiracy taking place, I just don’t think we’ll ever see the evidence to prove any substantial part of it. I also think crowdsourced internet sleuthing that has created online communities rife with confirmation bias and misinformation.

This post was edited on 1/1/23 at 12:10 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board