Started By
Message

re: Russia on the move with "most advanced tanks" into Ukraine from Belarus

Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:21 pm to
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
34983 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:21 pm to
Smh, sorry you live like this
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
15030 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

I wasn't being serious. Yes they are better than Iraq, but still a damn joke of a military.


Still one of the dumbest things I've ever read.

They have better air defense systems than we do.

They have better capabilities with cruise missiles than we do, when you compare their stuff to our defenses and vice versa.

Planes such as the SU-57 will be equal or better than just about everything we have. SU-30 and the other airframes they have are all very capable.

The combination of their aircraft and air defense systems is going to make air superiority very costly, and we may not achieve it - and if we don't, we are severely screwed. Anyone that thinks we just simply show up and own the air is legit crazy. This will be contested.

Russia can target every railhead and port in all of Europe except maybe way out in Portugal, and NATO does not have anything approaching a defense system strong enough to stop barrages of hypersonic missiles. That can make virtually all means of resupply a no-go.

Russia can launch these same hypersonic missiles from a variety of locations from subs and flatten London, Paris, Warsaw and other cities in a matter of minutes.

Russia will have subs (I would be shocked if they don't already have them) within a few hundred miles of our coastline, and at least one of them will be able to launch at least a dozen hypersonic missiles before they are ever detected at all. They can flatten DC, Ft. Bragg and a few other places in less than 20 minutes. If we strike deep within Russia, do not be surprised if multiple subs send dozenS of missiles to the east coast. Our sub force is very good but it's a tough task to prevent sub missile launches outright.

Our stealth is not going to be the magic panacea that people think it will be. Russia's S400 and S500 systems will track those planes. I believe they are starting to field the S500, but the S400 will be just fine against stealth platforms. This will not be like the F-117 flying over Baghdad.

They have an insane output of artillery and we can't come close to matching that. If they disrupt supply lines, our people will get chewed up in a meat grinder.

I do not believe they field a tank equal to the Abrams, but they will likely have a lot more in theater than we do.

On that note, a truly combined arms fight is going to require a very steep learning curve for us, and it will probably be ugly in the beginning. Our population can't handle micro-aggressions. What do you think happens when plane loads of body bags come back? And don't assume this can't happen - go look at Task Force Smith and how bad things can get when you send an unprepared force into battle.

Our Bradleys are good but have some vulnerabilities and under heavy artillery fire their strengths will be mitigated and allow BMP and BTR vehicles to close distance, mass fires, and attrit.

This will be fought in space and both the US and the Russians are likely to destroy satellites. That means no precision warfare for either side, which is a HUGE advantage for the Russians.

We are already buying artillery and other munitions from other NATO countries to give to Ukraine because we don't have enough in our stocks. Russia is firing about 3x more artillery each day than Ukraine. We can't match that and will have to use aviation to remove those pieces from the battlefield. IF we are successful, we are going to lose a lot of aircraft and pilots in the process, and it may not matter, if Russia can still feed more and more rounds to its remaining guns while we don't have the industrial capacity to do the same.

A lot of our equipment, such as the new lightweight 155mm artillery piece, is not performing well. HIMARS is not at all a difference maker. Some of this is because the Ukrainians are not good at using this stuff, but a lot is just because these things are not as good as we think they are.

Russia has built a continental army to defend Russia. They are operating next to their border. Logistics is a lot easier for them. We will have limited routes with which to access the theater and Russia can seriously impeded all movement into theater.

This demonization and ridicule of Russia and the Russian military is one of the biggest cases of mass psychosis I've ever seen. Russia is a true PEER on the battlefield. Don't be fooled by their entry into this war - every analyst knows they had a terrible plan, but it was deliberate. They will not make that mistake if we enter the battlefield. They can't afford to do so. Russia sees this as existential. Last time they faced that, they gave up 27 million people in fighting the Nazis. They are a proud people, just like we are - but we are not fighting for survival. Our people will be fighting so a gang of traitorous assholes in DC can get rich, and they don't care how many Americans, NATO members, and Ukrainians have to die. That's not such a good message for morale.

We just got done shitcanning over 50k troops over COVID vaccines, and much of our leadership is worried about pronouns and drag shows at installations. Anyone that thinks our military is ready for this is 100% stupid.

If you love our troops and love this country, you will seek to avoid this conflict at all costs. We will take HEAVY losses and will be damn lucky to not have a nuclear war where billions of people will end up dead.

This administration is unbelievably stupid. And the war mongers are just as dumb. If this war happens, we better have aliens, spaceships, hover tanks and magic bullets because, if there's no secret cache of new weapons out there, this is going to get very ugly.

Our nation has not been in a war like this since the 1940s. We lost about 55k in 10 years in Vietnam. Ukraine has probably lost 3x that in 10 months. For people that think we have magic equipment and shite, there is no magic against 152mm (and larger) artillery. It's not called the King of Battle for nothing.

People think our military is the 1972 Dolphins but that's not how it works. We've done everything imaginable for two years now to destroy our combat readiness. And we don't have 50% of the industrial capacity to feed a war effort like this is likely to need.

I pray that I am 100% wrong, but I fear that I'm not. This would be ugly for everyone and might be deadly for the entire planet.

Cheering on this war and minimizing the Russian side is like Vandy talking shite to Bama - it won't end well. It costs us nothing to show some respect and I highly recommend we start respecting Russia and their military. Eventually this Ugly American approach is going to lead to getting knocked the fricked out.

Putin was among the first, if not the first, to call Bush after 9/11. Russia is not our enemy, no matter how the indoctrination media wants you to believe that. Lastly, Russia is now in an alliance with many other nations, to include Saudi Arabia. These other nations may join, or at least severely disrupt the world's economy. Our lack of industrialization could seriously lead to us losing, badly. A large dose of humility and caution is warranted here.

Joe Biden is obviously stupid and his brain is diseased. His administration has made wrong move after wrong move for two years now. Why on earth would any sane individual buy into their song and dance about Russia? How many times do they have to be wrong before you take notice?
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
33138 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

I remember being all "gung ho" during Desert Storm. WAS a big GWB fan. Still have the newspapers from then.

A buddy and I were on our way to Starkville to watch an MSU basketball game and stopped in Louisville at a burger joint drive through and the "shock and awe" started while we were in the drive through (or at the least news over the radio got it at that time).
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
15030 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

More like Afghans....howd that work out again????


For us or the Soviets?
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
59290 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

POTUS2024


You are full of all kinds of stupid if you really believe even a fraction of all of that BS you just posted.
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
16965 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

You are full of all kinds of stupid if you really believe even a fraction of all of that BS you just posted.


Please feel free to rebut him by going over the many military defeats that Russia has suffered as the home team.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
15030 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

You are full of all kinds of stupid if you really believe even a fraction of all of that BS you just posted.


Great refutation. I now believe you. Very persuasive.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
21054 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

Anyone got an update on who is winning at this point?


US arms manufacturers are winning big time with orders from Eastern Europe's former Soviet satellites and the rest of the world. Poland was talking about ordering 500 HIMARS.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
33138 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

More like Afghans....howd that work out again????
Had we done what we should have done is bust the taliban's arse with some carpet bombs. Small tactical groups of Seals, Rangers, real CIA types hunt down the 6'5" guy with a kidney machine on his shoulder, kill his arse and get out, it would have been fine. But, no hell no. We needed to teach them democracy.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
37466 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:48 pm to
Lol
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
10548 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

You are full of all kinds of stupid if you really believe even a fraction of all of that BS you just posted.

Well you know a thing or two.

Enlighten us.
Posted by Tigers0891
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2017
6790 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 9:37 pm to
They haven't beaten Ukraine in 9 months. And that's with a small amount of HIMARS and javelin being given to them.

Outside of nukes, the US military would dog walk Russia within 3 months. They are piling up casualties as well and they haven't even been getting him back at home. The Ukrainians are simply playing defense. Russia hasn't even once had to play a mix of offense and homeland defense.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
58504 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Oh that’s great. Wonderful news.


It's great news for war profiteers and their patsy politicians. The rest of us, not so much.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
59290 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

They have better air defense systems than we do.


I don’t have the will to go over your whole spill and argue it all. From the very start you are wrong. Russia has proven that their air defenses suck by letting half assed drones/etc that are 20 plus years old technology get through and damage key infrastructure several times.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
58504 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

We are already buying artillery and other munitions from other NATO countries to give to Ukraine because we don't have enough in our stocks.


Why aren't those NATO countries selling them directly to Ukraine? Why are they using the US as the middle man?
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
36635 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

More like Afghans....howd that work out again????


quote:

For us or the Soviets?


Yes (and the Brits too).
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
15030 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

They haven't beaten Ukraine in 9 months.


We've given Ukraine more than Russia's entire defense budget, and we trained them for the last 8 yrs. And Russia has taken everything they want, they have a small fraction of the losses of Ukraine, and they entered theater with a horrible plan. They are beating Ukraine like a rented mule right now.

There seems to be a great misconception about doctrine from the former Soviet Union and parts of which have carried over to the Russian military. They do not operate on the notion that 'key terrain' is the arbiter of victory, as much as we do. And they do not look to land knockout blows on some philosophical center of gravity, as we like to do. For them, the center of gravity concept is much more pragmatic and mostly relates to the maneuver force they are facing. They will gladly give up terrain for time and the ability to bait an opponent, or swing extra weapons systems into action. Here in the US we think there is some notion of defeat in giving up territory. Russians are not so occupied with this idea - they know that if they keep working to destroy the Ukrainian military, they can take whatever territory they want, unopposed.

Look at real results - not proxy markers.

Regardless of these doctrinal discussions, Russia is winning and they're going to win this war. Not a single analyst on the planet thought Ukraine was close to Russia, and that's all proven correct. None of that is controversial, except in this land of fantasy where people believe Ukraine is awesome, kicking arse, and the US can just do a couple fly by's and Russia will scurry away like roaches. That's not how any of this will go down.

quote:

US military would dog walk Russia within 3 months


I keep noticing everyone that says such things can never make a concrete case for this. How can you possibly think this is true when we are having to get munitions from other nations to hand to Ukraine? You think we can just lob some potatoes at the Russians and make them go away? Do you think we can "shock & awe" them like we did the Iraqis?

This hubris is ridiculous.

Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
59290 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

You think we can just lob some potatoes at the Russians


You think the only weapons we have is the kind of crap we are giving to Ukraine? LOL
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9317 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 10:28 pm to
Divide and conquer. Get Ukraine to focus all of its best on the Eastern front, then while they aren’t looking, invade in the NW cutting their lines of supply off and meet in Kyiv for the Victory? If they can cut the country into two fronts, this is going to get real real bad for the Ukrainians. No wonder Zelenskyy was in town begging for more money. This war is just getting started.

Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
56532 posts
Posted on 12/23/22 at 10:28 pm to
This guy gets it. Clausewitz model -- the destruction of armies rather than the capture of cities.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram