- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NZ Parents refuse vaccinated blood for life-saving surgery on their baby
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:46 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:46 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
If a vaccine is approved by the FDA and is pretty universally accepted as safe, then yeah they are protected
No. Thinking the FDA gives blanket coverage that overrides their knowledge that he vaccine was dangerous is crazy.
quote:
It's actually pretty wild to think they wouldn't be in that situation.
Under the premise that they knew it was dangerous?
ok
2
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:49 pm to moneyg
all vaccines have risk of harm. That's standard. They're given because they lower relative risk.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:09 pm to moneyg
quote:
No. Thinking the FDA gives blanket coverage that overrides their knowledge that he vaccine was dangerous is crazy.
quote:
Under the premise that they knew it was dangerous? ok
What is this 'knowledge' you're talking about? Is it secret only to this one medical provider?
If something is generally accepted among an industry/field as being appropriate (mainly due to FDA approval), a single person is unlikely to lose their license over doing that same thing.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News