Started By
Message

re: Officiating question that drives me nuts…

Posted on 11/25/22 at 2:43 am to
Posted by CouldaShot79
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2021
546 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 2:43 am to
Makes sense to only rule if it’s for a first down or touchdown, but I agree, once a review is initiated, the review should be used to cover every aspect that can be seen in that particular part of the play. I’ve been saying this for a while with penalties. I’m fine with penalties not being reviewable by themselves, but if a play is under review for something else and there was an irrefutable missed call shown in the replay clip, it should also be corrected. The Goedert fumble play from the eagles game last week is a perfect example. Play goes to review for the fumble, the no call face mask was irrefutable on replay, but by rule they didn’t change it. They need to incorporate that going forward. That was a game deciding play and it happens often enough to matter.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26907 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 5:36 am to
This. The concept of anything being “unreviewable” is infuriating.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram