Started By
Message

re: Alex Stein confronts armed antifa guarding drag queen story time in Denton, TX

Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:06 am to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:06 am to
quote:

So "physical harm" is the only criteria we should consider?
when one is talking about the use of the coercive power of the state to override parental choices in raising their own children, yes, I think you need some sort of objective standard (like physical harm) rather than the subjective views of one segment of society.

Is it in evitable that some children will be harmed if the State stays out of parenting? Of course. Just as it is inevitable, that some children will be harmed of parents were allowed to let the children ride bicycles without helmets or to climb trees without rope/tackle and safety nets (which I also believe should be the parents’ choice).

You think that listening to ruPaul read a story does severe lasting harm to a child. I do not. It is my view that the State should not enforce your view upon me. This really is not a complex issue.
Posted by minister of truth
Somewhere new for 6-12 months
Member since May 2022
1167 posts
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:10 am to
quote:

You think that listening to ruPaul read a story does severe lasting harm to a child. I do not. It is my view that the State should not enforce your view upon me. This really is not a complex issue.



So now you're a psychologist as well as the board attorney. So you think all parents have the ability to make sound/moral decisions that are best for their children? Do you think they're perhaps millions of parents who have psychological/psychiatric issues that prevent them from making sound/moral decisions that are best for their children?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48712 posts
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:11 am to
quote:

when one is talking about the use of the coercive power of the state to override parental choices in raising their own children, yes, I think you need some sort of objective standard (like physical harm) rather than the subjective views of one segment of society.


Then you haven’t read the Texas family code recently. Emotional harm is all over the abuse/neglect statutes. I’m not saying a drag reading reaches that level, but I’m surprised a Texas family law attorney wouldn’t know the family code.

My concern isn’t you defending drag readings to kids, as strange as that is…it the erratic behavior in this thread you don’t usually show in other threads. You have compared taking communion and going to bible study as equally “crazy” as taking a child to be taught by a drag Queen. These are objectively wild comparisons and any rational person would be able to see that. For some reason this topic makes you irrational. Not sure why. Maybe it’s the combo of drag support and a hatred of religion?
This post was edited on 11/21/22 at 8:13 am
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140740 posts
Posted on 11/21/22 at 9:07 am to
You are ok with desensitizing very young children to a swath of freaks that are prone to violence, addiction and otherwise harmful behavior such as promiscuity?

Also, physical harm isn’t the only harm in question.

Lots of abused children and women were never attacked physically.

This is such a weird hill for you to stand on.
This post was edited on 11/21/22 at 9:22 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram