Started By
Message

re: Kari Lake now down 14,000

Posted on 11/10/22 at 7:05 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124236 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 7:05 am to
It's interesting the NYTimes suspended all updates. The AZ count is not only non-transparent, it has gone dark.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15052 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 7:12 am to
The NY Times is continuing to update every few minutes.

They have stopped doing the "chances of winning" stuff as of yesterday at 4am EDT.

But the updates (absolute numbers) continue there.
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
26059 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 7:18 am to
quote:

It's interesting the NYTimes suspended all updates. The AZ count is not only non-transparent, it has gone dark.


They do t want Trump to get credit for her so media silence as the steal takes place in Nevada.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
25087 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 7:22 am to
quote:

It's interesting the NYTimes suspended all updates. The AZ count is not only non-transparent, it has gone dark.


And “oversight” is being provided by the Democrat candidate.

Yeah, because that’s not a clear conflict of interest.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
25026 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 8:32 am to
quote:

count is not only non-transparent, it has gone dark

We've seen this movie before.

There was cell phone footage of poll workers taping paper over the windows so people couldn't see in, and kicking out watchers who had every right to be there.

Where are they counting this (s)election? A fricking bunker?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram