Started By
Message
locked post

Fact Checkers accidentally confirm that Cali bill SB-145 decriminalizes some pedophilia

Posted on 10/18/22 at 7:56 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81704 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 7:56 pm
So long as it is sodomy, and within 10 years

A 24-year old can frick a 14-year old in the arse, and he is not considered a sex offender.

LINK

quote:

In other words, rather than the young adult being an automatically registered as sex offender, the judge may decide. The most extreme example would be a 24-year-old engaging in non-coercive vaginal sex with a 14-year-old. A more common example, in which it would likely be inappropriate to add a person to the registry, would be a 19-year-old and a 17-year-old having vaginal sex.


This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 7:57 pm
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50260 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 7:57 pm to
That’s a pretty awfully written law, but

quote:

A 24-year old can frick a 14-year old in the arse


That’s not pedophilia.
This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 7:59 pm
Posted by BearCrocs
Member since Aug 2013
8060 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 7:59 pm to
A&M says hi
Posted by cheeznet
Member since Nov 2015
274 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 7:59 pm to
How about 18 and 8?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81704 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

That’s not pedophilia.
Hebaphilia, then

Jesus dude

Not like it isn't just as bad.
This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 8:02 pm
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50260 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

How about 18 and 8?


Well, yeah, that’s pedophilia and wouldn’t have anything to do with the law discussed in the OP.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26811 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:01 pm to
Aren't you a libertarian? No pushing morals on people?
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50260 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

Pedarasty, then Jesus dude


We’re not talking semantics. It’s very much worth distinguishing the two. Pedophilia is sexual attraction to children who have not even hit puberty yet. That is exponentially worse than a 24 year old sleeping with a physically mature 14 year old.
Posted by cheeznet
Member since Nov 2015
274 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:01 pm to
Ah. I concede.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
41819 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:02 pm to
Where is Hank?

Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81704 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Aren't you a libertarian?


Yes

quote:

No pushing morals on people?

Who believes in this?

Every political party wants morals pushed on the populace.

Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81704 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

We’re not talking semantics.
You 100% are.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26811 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

Who believes in this?


A whole lot of people say it all the time here on this forum. Just the other day, I think in the "libertarian" thread, the argument was made concerning gay marriage. When I brought up marriage arrangements the guy might find distasteful he ghosted.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
69220 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:07 pm to
The foundation of libertarianism is consent and voluntary action. Children are not assumed to have the capacity to consent because they lack the maturity to truly understand and comprehend what they’re agreeing to.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81704 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

A whole lot of people say it all the time here on this forum.
Name 1 law that isn't enforcing morals

Just 1

I'll wait.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50260 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

You 100% are.


No, I am not.

If you believe a grown man putting his penis inside of a prepubescent child is in the same universe of moral depravity as a teenager having consensual sex with an adult, then we don’t have anything else to discuss here.

Otherwise, just change the thread title instead of digging your heels in.
This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 8:08 pm
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26811 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

Children are not assumed to have the capacity to consent because they lack the maturity to truly understand and comprehend what they’re agreeing to.



And yet people believe they're mature enough to have an abortion, pick which parent they want to live with and a host of other decisions. We're especially concerned, as we should be, about decisions regarding sex because we have moral norms regarding sex.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81704 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

No, I am not.
If you want toi be the E/LA teacher on the board, fine.

Technically you are right. But Pedo has been used in the common vernacular to label sex with any minor child by an adult.

If this is your "line in the sand" fine. Be the "ackshually" guy.

But everyone knows exactly what I meant, and so did you.

Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
13131 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

Every political party wants morals pushed on the populace.


Nah, if they're my kids, I'll push my morals on you 230 grains at a time.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26811 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

Name 1 law that isn't enforcing morals

Just 1

I'll wait.


You're trying to argue with the wrong person; I KNOW laws enforce morals. I'm talking about the "you can't legislate morality" crowd, and there's a high concentration of them in the libertarian circles.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram