- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: for the pro-choice, here are your real choices
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:42 am to SammyTiger
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:42 am to SammyTiger
quote:
For a board that obsessed with “groomers”
no one seems to want to talk about how it’s a good thing to have an arduous screening process to get a kid.
Screening process isn't the issue. Cost is, and I think that's by design. More adopted kids would be raised in strong, stable homes. The left wants as little of that as possible.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:46 am to VADawg
quote:
Screening process isn't the issue. Cost is, and I think that's by design. More adopted kids would be raised in strong, stable homes. The left wants as little of that as possible.
Not sure where you are, but in the state of Missouri the state covers the cost of adoption if you are a foster parent and are adopting kids from the system. Plus, nationally there is something like $15k tax write off to cover the cost of adoption, you just either have that money to cover the cost up front cost or find an adoption lawyer that will await payment until you've received the tax rebate
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:47 am to VADawg
quote:
Screening process isn't the issue. Cost is, and I think that's by design. More adopted kids would be raised in strong, stable homes. The left wants as little of that as possible.
How many abortions are there a year and how many people are on the adoption waiting lists
Supply vs demand.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News