Started By
Message

re: for the pro-choice, here are your real choices

Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:42 am to
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45177 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:42 am to
quote:

For a board that obsessed with “groomers”
no one seems to want to talk about how it’s a good thing to have an arduous screening process to get a kid.


Screening process isn't the issue. Cost is, and I think that's by design. More adopted kids would be raised in strong, stable homes. The left wants as little of that as possible.
Posted by AgSGT
Dixon, MO
Member since Aug 2011
1665 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Screening process isn't the issue. Cost is, and I think that's by design. More adopted kids would be raised in strong, stable homes. The left wants as little of that as possible.


Not sure where you are, but in the state of Missouri the state covers the cost of adoption if you are a foster parent and are adopting kids from the system. Plus, nationally there is something like $15k tax write off to cover the cost of adoption, you just either have that money to cover the cost up front cost or find an adoption lawyer that will await payment until you've received the tax rebate
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
67328 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Screening process isn't the issue. Cost is, and I think that's by design. More adopted kids would be raised in strong, stable homes. The left wants as little of that as possible.


How many abortions are there a year and how many people are on the adoption waiting lists

Supply vs demand.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram