Started By
Message

re: Why Dyson Daniels?

Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:00 pm to
Posted by gotiger
Delray Beach, FL
Member since Feb 2009
2778 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

Think of a better scoring Lonzo . Great defender, unselfish, great passer, but unlike Lonzo, he can actually run a half court offense. His weakness is shooting, but we have the Vingoat for that


Better scoring Lonzo from a finishing perspective? That was Lonzo’s problem. He couldn’t control the 1/2 court by making himself a threat to drive.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14669 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

Better scoring Lonzo from a finishing perspective?

Correct
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116767 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:03 pm to
Dyson is definitely a better finisher at the same age. He has a nice floater too.

Can’t shoot for shite. (Although he shot way better in his last 9 games)
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72110 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:06 pm to
He’s 3” taller than Lonzo
Wingy is 4” longer
Standing reach is + 4.5”

There is substantially more length here with Dyson
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram