- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michael Peterson vs Scott Peterson - did both of them actually do it?
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This sounds very sleezy laweryly, but it's a bedrock of our legal system: just because he killed her doesn't make a guilty conviction proper.
I agree 100%, just because someone may have done something doesn't mean that it's been proven without reasonable doubt that they did it. That's how I feel about the two cases discussed here and the Adnan case.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 2:07 pm to Epic Cajun
People just don't really grasp what "beyond a reasonable doubt" means, and I mean that in terms of jurors who are told what it means explicitly in a trial over and over again will base their vote on less than a preponderance often.
Beyond a reasonable doubt is HARD, and it's supposed to be.
Beyond a reasonable doubt is HARD, and it's supposed to be.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News