- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We could still literally add picks 1 and 2
Posted on 4/8/22 at 6:47 pm to brmark70816
Posted on 4/8/22 at 6:47 pm to brmark70816
I like Mitchell, but to get him you'd give up depth and length. He's a top 5 guard, but I'd disagree he's a fringe top 5 player. He's in the higher end of the second tier of stars
Buy those guys low like McCollum where you gave up next to nothing.
Buy those guys low like McCollum where you gave up next to nothing.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:50 pm to htran90
quote:
I like Mitchell, but to get him you'd give up depth and length. He's a top 5 guard, but I'd disagree he's a fringe top 5 player. He's in the higher end of the second tier of stars
Not in the trade that I proposed or inquired. It's the 3 picks and 2 players (they could add in Temple to make the money work).
Starting 5
McCollum, Mitchell, Ingram, Zion, Val
Bench
Alvarado, Lewis, Murphy, Jones, Hayes, Hernangomez, plus we would still have exceptions.
It could work, in the miniscule world where we would get the first two picks. I just don't know if that is enough or too much to get Mitchell. I don't like star chasing. But that is a Championship level team and would be the best starting 5 in the league. Plus, a really good bench..
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News