Started By
Message

re: We could still literally add picks 1 and 2

Posted on 4/8/22 at 6:47 pm to
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30150 posts
Posted on 4/8/22 at 6:47 pm to
I like Mitchell, but to get him you'd give up depth and length. He's a top 5 guard, but I'd disagree he's a fringe top 5 player. He's in the higher end of the second tier of stars

Buy those guys low like McCollum where you gave up next to nothing.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9840 posts
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

I like Mitchell, but to get him you'd give up depth and length. He's a top 5 guard, but I'd disagree he's a fringe top 5 player. He's in the higher end of the second tier of stars



Not in the trade that I proposed or inquired. It's the 3 picks and 2 players (they could add in Temple to make the money work).

Starting 5
McCollum, Mitchell, Ingram, Zion, Val

Bench
Alvarado, Lewis, Murphy, Jones, Hayes, Hernangomez, plus we would still have exceptions.

It could work, in the miniscule world where we would get the first two picks. I just don't know if that is enough or too much to get Mitchell. I don't like star chasing. But that is a Championship level team and would be the best starting 5 in the league. Plus, a really good bench..
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram