- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Drunk Grandma Admits They Are Powerless to Send US MIL Assets into Ukraine (Video)
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:07 am
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:07 am
quote:
“Unfortunately for us, I mean not for us… Unfortunately for the situation, we cannot go in militarily.”
Whoopsy!
Apologies for having to link my own Tweet, but it's the only spot I can easily host the video. Everything else came from Telegram, and I know not everyone has that.
ETA - In case anyone was curious, I imagine it begs the question: If they're admitting they're incapable of committing troops to Ukraine, who is preventing them from doing so?
Hint: It isn't the MIC, whose pockets get lined as US troops enter harm's way.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 12:27 pm
13
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:12 am to VoxDawg
Sounds weird but this is reassuring.
The MIC is pushing for war, and hearing this bag of dog shite say we can’t participate in a hot war with Russia is better than the alternative.
Still pisses me off everyday that we are funding arming Ukraine and whatever scams they have to launder our tax dollars.
The MIC is pushing for war, and hearing this bag of dog shite say we can’t participate in a hot war with Russia is better than the alternative.
Still pisses me off everyday that we are funding arming Ukraine and whatever scams they have to launder our tax dollars.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:12 am to VoxDawg
No focus on the part where she had to add the President to Biden?
Thats gotta mean Trump is president and not that she's an old, sloppy quack.
Thats gotta mean Trump is president and not that she's an old, sloppy quack.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:13 am to VoxDawg
She doesn't say anything of value. Typical of her.
What are the reasons we "can't go in MIL"? I'm glad they aren't pushing for our boys and girls to go over.
What are the reasons we "can't go in MIL"? I'm glad they aren't pushing for our boys and girls to go over.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:14 am to VoxDawg
quote:Following.
VoxDawg
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:16 am to Yaboylsu63
quote:
Still pisses me off everyday that we are funding arming Ukraine and whatever scams they have to launder our tax dollars
All this would do is get a lot more people killed. A lot
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 11:16 am
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:16 am to idlewatcher
quote:
What are the reasons we "can't go in MIL"?
Thats not the point.
Vox, just dump some shite on us. I haven't been keeping up, so I have no clue what straws are being used today.
I dont see it, but I still hope I'm wrong.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:17 am to VoxDawg
You are now followed by PanTangTyger
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:18 am to VoxDawg
As I pointed out in another thread I don’t think they’re powerless I think they’re afraid. While the chance is small maybe even infantile at the moment, if they sent the army to secure their corruption in Ukraine what protects them if we decide it’s time to hang them in street? The best possible thing for the neo-Marxist would be Russia incursion into Poland or Finland. They get their war and the nation would be more United around it and them than just Ukraine.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 11:19 am
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:18 am to idlewatcher
quote:
I'm glad they aren't pushing for our boys and girls to go over.
Me too.
quote:
What are the reasons we "can't go in MIL"?
I'm of the opinion that the rhetoric of the politicos who are currently "in charge" doesn't match their actions (not getting us involved in UKR via boots on the ground, thank God) because the US Military is not letting them send troops into harms way just to protect their money laundering wonderland ATM that is Ukraine.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:21 am to VoxDawg
When you're dumber than the gin and tonic you drink.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:23 am to td01241
It does appear the Pentagon are putting the clamps on this, while the State Department pushes for war. Col Doug Macgregor says Burns (head of CIA) is with the realists fighting off the warhawks.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:40 am to VoxDawg
She says we cannot go in military because it will be WW3-- makes sense...
But they are so shady using a proxy war sending military troops via NATO countries.
The way she flubs is scary she is a drunk who mixed up things and names.
But they are so shady using a proxy war sending military troops via NATO countries.
The way she flubs is scary she is a drunk who mixed up things and names.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:41 am to TSLG
quote:
Vox, just dump some shite on us
I'd start with these 3 videos. If that wets your whistle, then dig in on the main course.
Despite their ovations to the contrary, they aren't getting us into a hot war with Russia because the CAN'T. It's not for lack of desire. In a wartime footing, all of these crooks get even wealthier.
In a devolved continuity of government scenario, the current illegitimate regime is welcome to send all the aid they want, but no committable actions with respect to boots on the ground/in the air over Ukraine.
They're able to move troops around to various military bases in and around NATO ally countries, but nothing in Ukraine.
It's the only scenario that explains the discrepancy between the platitudes they're heaping on Zelensky and the relative inaction, otherwise.
They do not because the CAN NOT.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 11:42 am
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:41 am to Aquila
With no tinfoil required she is in her best light lying. She says we can't use the military. Yes we can. Lie.
Why aren't we using the military is the question.
Fear of WW3 is the publics most popular belief of as to why the govt has not committed us to truly defending ukraine.
Others have more complex explanations.
Either way she lies and continues to be a sack of shite.
Why aren't we using the military is the question.
Fear of WW3 is the publics most popular belief of as to why the govt has not committed us to truly defending ukraine.
Others have more complex explanations.
Either way she lies and continues to be a sack of shite.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 11:42 am
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:43 am to VoxDawg
“Unfortunately for us, I mean not for us… Unfortunately for the situation, we cannot go in militarily because it will cause WW3.”
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:44 am to 19
quote:Stalking you too on Twitter now
19
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:47 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Unfortunately for the situation, we cannot go in militarily because it will cause WW3.”
That's not what she said. I get the context, but let's not give this the Adam Schiff treatment and rework the statement to say what one feels it means.
"Unfortunately for us... we cannot go in militarily." strikes me as meaning precisely what it says. She didn't invoke WWIII until 30 seconds later after a whole lot of word salad.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:53 am to FATBOY TIGER
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 11:59 am
Posted on 3/21/22 at 11:54 am to dr
quote:
don't be so hard on yourself
I think he's meaning the uber-flammable Pelosi.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News