re: IMPEACHMENT: Why isn't this on the table front and center? (for multiple USCON violations)

quote:

---

those who will replace the potato are so repulsive and worse that there is no options to remove the potato

---

Yep, the whole concept of putting the worst possible option as VP during the “selection” process makes perfect sense now.

quote:

---

All 3 should be impeached (xiden*,Impala, pelosi) and convicted.

Someone wants charges:
Aiding an abetting the enemy.
Lying about the plandemic.
Election Fraud.
Spying on a duly elected president.
Money Laundering.

---

Yup. FOR STARTERS.

The list of Impeachable Articles (incl Treason) is a mile long.

GOP and its "Leadership":

quote:

---

Perfect. You're not a serious poster.

---

So yes? That is what you were asking?

WildTchop already explained it for you.

quote:

---

With all the fricking impeachment talk we've heard about for the last 5 years, you still don't understand how the impeachment process works???...A resolution on impeachment has to be brought to the floor of the House BY THE SPEAKER for a vote.

---

Yeah -- and EVERYTHING begins with LOUD frickin CHATTER, doesn't it? Republicans ENMASS must begin getting loud. VERY loud. (OR are you recommending that Republicans just lie down like surrender-monkeys, remaining a polite church mice because Nanzi will gavel it down?)

quote:

---

Do you honestly think that Democrat Nancy Pelosi is going to bring such a resolution to the floor for a vote?

---

Geez. Go back to your bunker under your bed with your mug of chamomile tea. The rest of us will try sorting it out.

because we elected shitty rinos in on it in the primary, but you continue to vote for them because they have money or theyre "former military" i blame all of the idiot republican primary voters

quote:

---

The problem is you're some kind of troll.

---

Oh, the irony.

quote:

---

If the Republicans don't take back the house, they have no chance at impeaching the current president

---

Duh #1

quote:

---

If the republicans don't take back the House AND Senate, they have no chance of impeachment AND removal of the current president from office.

---

Duh #2 (You're repeating yourself)

Calm down. Gulp down another 3 Midol. Brew another mug of Chamomile. (again -- we'll figure it out. Thanks.)

quote:

---

That's been going on for 40 years now. We're going to impeach a President for doing what every President has done for the last 7?

---

Trump flew illegals all over the country in the middle of the night without vetting them?

Other presidents went against court orders?

quote:

---

Did other presidents turn the border patrol into a welcoming committee and settlement agency?

---

I have no idea. Are you under the impression that is an impeachable offense? You guys sit around watching hucksters like Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson whose sole purpose is to whip up your ire so they can fleece you. Here is what Kevin Williamson had to say about that recently:

quote:

---

Some Americans may live in a Tucker Carlson bubble while others live in a Rachel Maddow bubble, but those aren’t the only kinds of bubbles. If you have spent very much time around media figures and politicians, then you will understand that however their respective audiences are sorted, Rachel Maddow and Tucker Carlson live in the same bubble.
Top-shelf Fox News hosts and their MSNBC counterparts are all multimillionaire employees of multinational media conglomerates, they typically work one block away from each other at their respective studios in Manhattan, they live in the same neighborhoods if not in the same buildings, their children go to the same schools, etc. — and they have a lot more in common with one another than either has in common with the shmucks who compose their audiences, in the same way two competing dairymen have more in common with one another than either has in common with the herds of cows they milk. The chief of staff for a Democratic senator has more in common with the chief of staff of a Republican senator than either has in common with most of the people who elect those senators.

---

quote:

---

Other presidents went against court orders?

---

• In November, the U.S. Postal Service failed to follow a judge’s time frame to sweep mail facilities for undelivered ballots in 12 postal districts.

• The U.S. Department of Homeland Security made incorrect statements in defense of a decision to oust New York from expedited border crossing programs. DHS officials had wrongly said New York was unique in restricting federal access to motor vehicle records, and that endangered national security. The agency later admitted that several states have similar restrictions.

• The Trump administration tried to remove a mother and her child from the United States despite assuring a judge that no one would immediately be deported while he considered an emergency order. The judge threatened contempt proceedings if the government did not turn around a plane carrying the two people.

• The U.S. Department of Education collected loans from former students of a for-profit college chain, despite an order to stop.

• The U.S. Department of Commerce appeared to push ahead with an early deadline to the census count, despite a federal judge’s order banning the shorter deadlines. The U.S. Supreme Court later allowed an end to the data collection.

• President Donald Trump declared that he would try to include a citizenship question in the census survey, although the Supreme Court said the government had to provide a better explanation for including the question. Trump eventually relented and said the citizenship information would be collected from other records.

Trump clearly did, lol