re: Chuck at FB

quote:

---

I believe that everyone is refering to putting him in the FB slot, not actually using him as a fullback. So as to have two of our talented backs in the same backfield with no idea which style will be used.

---

He compared it to using Hester at FB. The main reason Hester lined up at fullback was to be used as a receiver. At one point, the commentators even talked about how often we threw to Hester when he was lined up at fullback. Therefore, my point about Hester being a better blocker/receiver is valid in the argument.

If it is all about disquising who gets the handoff, we're better off lining up in the T.

quote:

---

I'm almost positive that I saw this against MSU.

---

They did it in an earlier game too (App I think), and we ran the wheel route to the FB play that Hester had called back againt Ark. The QB just didn't throw Scott the ball, he went somewhere else.

quote:

---

Because he's not a FB.

---

And his name's not "Chuck".

it could work for a play or two a game.

but CS is best utilized raping and pillaging D-lines with a FB in front of him

I WAS WATCHING HIGHLIGHTS OF LAST YEARS FLORIDA GAME AND ONE OF KIELANDS SCORES WAS ON A SIMILAR PLAY WITH THE FULLBACK DIVING AND HIM (KIELAND) GETTING THE TOSS ON THE CORNER. I NEVER MEANT FOR CS TO BLOCK. I MEANT TO EITHER SPREAD OUT THE DEFENSE OR DRAW THEM IN TO PUT KIELAND/MURPHY OUT ON THE CORNER WITH NO ONE OR AT MOST ONE PERSON TO BEAT TO GET TO THE ENDZONE.