- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Study: Ivermectin doesn't work.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 7:56 am to CatholicLSUDude
Posted on 2/19/22 at 7:56 am to CatholicLSUDude
quote:
This is a study on high risk patients. Most people aren’t high risk.
High risk patients are who dies of covid. Almost no one, who is not high risk, dies of covid. I’Ve been telling all the ivermectin yo-yos this for a year: All these low risk people who took ivermectin, and lived, describe their experience, and it sounds just like mine, and everyone else who didn’t take anything.
The data is overwhelming that if you have no natural immunity, and you want to medicate to avoid covid’s worst outcomes, you should get vaccinated. Your chances would improve by about 6300%, and the side effects are either very mild or extraordinarily rare.
5
Posted on 2/19/22 at 7:58 am to Penrod
Bahaaaa. Stating opinions as fact
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:43 am to Penrod
quote:
The data is overwhelming that if you have no natural immunity, and you want to medicate to avoid covid’s worst outcomes, you should get vaccinated. Your chances would improve by about 6300%, and the side effects are either very mild or extraordinarily rare.
You’re only off by 6260%. Other than that, good post from the limp dick.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:47 am to Penrod
quote:
The data is overwhelming that if you have no natural immunity, and you want to medicate to avoid covid’s worst outcomes, you should get vaccinated. Your chances would improve by about 6300%, and the side effects are either very mild or extraordinarily rare.
All of this is a lie, and you continue to be the most stupid person that posts on these boards.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:51 am to Penrod
quote:
6300%,
WOW! That’s amazing!!
Posted on 2/19/22 at 12:53 pm to Penrod
quote:Link?
Your chances would improve by about 6300%
quote:I guess you'd need to define "extraordinarily rare" vs the "extraordinarily rare" incidence of poor outcome in patients contracting the B.1.1.529 variant.
the side effects are either very mild or extraordinarily rare.
The fact this study was small, targeted only "high risk" patients, did not define Malaysian standard of care beyond vague generalities, included an odd severity of disease end-point, and did not delve further into differences in fatality and/or ventilation, renders the result little more than marginally scientifically useful.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News